[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdDJ2Eeur3oG01_1s6iS9aZXBzaoDfk+s6tEgEdqbdTow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:57:52 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] gpiolib: Replace open coded gpiochip_irqchip_add_allocated_domain()
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 2:52 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:49 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Replace open coded variant of gpiochip_irqchip_add_allocated_domain()
> > in gpiochip_add_irqchip().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> and this concludes patches 4,5 very nicely as well.
Yep!
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Thank you for the review!
While at it, I would like to ask on ->to_irq() callback. IIUC
assigning it with an IRQ chip makes a dead code in the driver. Am I
correct? If not, can somebody shed some light on how the RT5677
driver, for example, works with GPIO IRQ?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists