linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 0/11] LSM: Three basic syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f43449f878f629805d5de7fd06306741.paul@paul-moore.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2023 22:14:42 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        john.johansen@...onical.com, mic@...ikod.net
Cc:     linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
        serge@...lyn.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, stephen.smalley.work@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/11] LSM: Three basic syscalls

On Jun 29, 2023 Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> 
> Add three system calls for the Linux Security Module ABI ...

I saw two small things (see patches 7/11 and 8/11) when looking at the
patchset today, but otherwise it looks pretty good to me.  However,
before I can merge this, at a minimum I would like to get an ACK from
John on the AppArmor patch; an ACK or a Reviewed-by on the rest of the
patchset would be great too.  I know Mickaël has reviewed and commented
on this patchset before, it would be nice if we could get his
ACK/Reviewed-by too.  Of course reviews and comments are always welcome
from anyone who has looked over the code; this is an important patchset
so the more eyes the better.

Assuming no one catches anything further, I think we can get this into
the lsm/next branch as soon as the merge window closes.

Thanks for all your work on this Casey.

--
paul-moore.com