[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230630183020.GA4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 20:30:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"bagasdotme@...il.com" <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
"nik.borisov@...e.com" <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "Shahar, Sagi" <sagis@...gle.com>,
"imammedo@...hat.com" <imammedo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 07/22] x86/virt/tdx: Add skeleton to enable TDX on
demand
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 09:55:32AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-06-30 at 11:26 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:10:00AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 15:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 02:12:37AM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdx_cpu_enable);
> > > >
> > > > I can't find a single caller of this.. why is this exported?
> > >
> > > It's for KVM TDX patch to use, which isn't in this series.
> > >
> > > I'll remove the export. KVM TDX series can export it.
> >
> > Fair enough; where will the KVM TDX series call this? Earlier there was
> > talk about doing it at kvm module load time -- but I objected (and still
> > do object) to that.
> >
> > What's the current plan?
> >
>
> The direction is still doing it during module load (not my series anyway). But
> this can be a separate discussion with KVM maintainers involved.
They all on Cc afaict.
> I understand you have concern that you don't want to have the memory & cpu time
> wasted on enabling TDX by default. For that we can have a kernel command line
> to disable TDX once for all (we can even make it default).
That's insane, I don't want to totally disable it. I want it done at
guard creation. Do the whole TDX setup the moment you actually create a
TDX guast.
Totally killing TDX is stupid, just about as stupid as doing it on
module load (which equates to always doing it).
> Also, KVM will have a module parameter 'enable_tdx'. I am hoping this could
> reduce your concern too.
I don't get this obsession with doing at module load time :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists