linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v5 13/17] vsock: enable setting SO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230701063947.3422088-14-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Date:   Sat, 1 Jul 2023 09:39:43 +0300
From:   Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
CC:     <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kernel@...rdevices.ru>, <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
        <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>,
        Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v5 13/17] vsock: enable setting SO_ZEROCOPY

For AF_VSOCK, zerocopy tx mode depends on transport, so this option must
be set in AF_VSOCK implementation where transport is accessible (if
transport is not set during setting SO_ZEROCOPY: for example socket is
not connected, then SO_ZEROCOPY will be enabled, but once transport will
be assigned, support of this type of transmission will be checked).

To handle SO_ZEROCOPY, AF_VSOCK implementation uses SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT
bit, thus handling SOL_SOCKET option operations, but all of them except
SO_ZEROCOPY will be forwarded to the generic handler by calling
'sock_setsockopt()'.

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
---
 Changelog:
 v4 -> v5:
  * This patch is totally reworked. Previous version added check for
    PF_VSOCK directly to 'net/core/sock.c', thus allowing to set
    SO_ZEROCOPY for AF_VSOCK type of socket. This new version catches
    attempt to set SO_ZEROCOPY in 'af_vsock.c'. All other options
    except SO_ZEROCOPY are forwarded to generic handler. Only this
    option is processed in 'af_vsock.c'. Handling this option includes
    access to transport to check that MSG_ZEROCOPY transmission is
    supported by the current transport (if it is set, if not - transport
    will be checked during 'connect()').

 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index da22ae0ef477..8acc77981d01 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1406,8 +1406,18 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		if (vsock_msgzerocopy_allow(transport))
+		if (!vsock_msgzerocopy_allow(transport)) {
+			/* If this option was set before 'connect()',
+			 * when transport was unknown, check that this
+			 * feature is supported here.
+			 */
+			if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY)) {
+				err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+				goto out;
+			}
+		} else {
 			set_bit(SOCK_SUPPORT_ZC, &sk->sk_socket->flags);
+		}
 
 		err = vsock_auto_bind(vsk);
 		if (err)
@@ -1643,7 +1653,7 @@ static int vsock_connectible_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
 	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
 	u64 val;
 
-	if (level != AF_VSOCK)
+	if (level != AF_VSOCK && level != SOL_SOCKET)
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 
 #define COPY_IN(_v)                                       \
@@ -1666,6 +1676,34 @@ static int vsock_connectible_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
 
 	transport = vsk->transport;
 
+	if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
+		if (optname == SO_ZEROCOPY) {
+			int zc_val;
+
+			/* Use 'int' type here, because variable to
+			 * set this option usually has this type.
+			 */
+			COPY_IN(zc_val);
+
+			if (zc_val < 0 || zc_val > 1) {
+				err = -EINVAL;
+				goto exit;
+			}
+
+			if (transport && !vsock_msgzerocopy_allow(transport)) {
+				err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+				goto exit;
+			}
+
+			sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY,
+					  zc_val ? true : false);
+			goto exit;
+		}
+
+		release_sock(sk);
+		return sock_setsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+	}
+
 	switch (optname) {
 	case SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE:
 		COPY_IN(val);
@@ -2321,6 +2359,8 @@ static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
 		}
 	}
 
+	set_bit(SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT, &sk->sk_socket->flags);
+
 	vsock_insert_unbound(vsk);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.25.1