Message-ID: <20230702-headway-dreamlike-d7ba39ac4910@spud>
Date:   Sun, 2 Jul 2023 14:47:41 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
Cc:     ardb@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        rminnich@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, jdelvare@...e.com,
        yc.hung@...iatek.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
        allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
        tinghan.shen@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, geshijian@...edance.com,
        weidong.wd@...edance.com, alexghiti@...osinc.com,
        sunilvl@...tanamicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: obtain ACPI RSDP from FFI.

Hey,
%subject: riscv: obtain ACPI RSDP from FFI.

This subject is a bit unhelpful because FFI would commonly mean "foreign
function interface" & you have not yet introduced it. It seems like it
would be better to do s/FFI/devicetree/ or similar.
Please also drop the full stop from the commit messages ;)

Please use a cover letter for multi-patch series & include changelogs.

+CC Sunil, Alex:

Can you guys please take a look at this & see if it is something that we
want to do (ACPI without EFI)?

On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 05:57:32PM +0800, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> 1. We need to enable the ACPI function on RISC-V.

RISC-V already supports ACPI, the "we" in this commit message is
confusing. Who is "we"? Bytedance?

> When booting with
> Coreboot, we encounter two problems:
> a. Coreboot does not support EFI


> b. On RISC-V, only the DTS channel can be used.

We support ACPI, so this seems inaccurate. Could you explain it better
please?

> 2. Based on this, we have added an interface for obtaining firmware
> information transfer through FDT, named FFI.

Please use the long form of "FFI" before using the short form, since you
are inventing this & noone knows what it means yet.

> 3. We not only use FFI to pass ACPI RSDP, but also pass other
> firmware information as an extension.

This patch doesn't do that though?

> +RISC-V FDT FIRMWARE INTERFACE (FFI) SUPPORT
> +M:     Yunhui Cui cuiyunhui@...edance.com
> +S:     Maintained
> +F:     arch/riscv/include/asm/ffi.h
> +F:     arch/riscv/kernel/ffi.c

Please add this in alphabetical order, these entries have recently been
resorted. That said, maintainers entry for a trivial file in arch code
seems a wee bit odd, seems like it would be better suited rolled up into
your other entry for the interface, like how Ard's one looks for EFI?

> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index b49793cf34eb..2e1c40fb2300 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -785,6 +785,16 @@ config EFI
>  	  allow the kernel to be booted as an EFI application. This
>  	  is only useful on systems that have UEFI firmware.
>  
> +config FFI
> +	bool "Fdt firmware interface"
> +	depends on OF
> +	default y
> +	help
> +	  Added an interface to obtain firmware information transfer
> +	  through FDT, named FFI. Some bootloaders do not support EFI,
> +	  such as coreboot.
> +	  We can pass firmware information through FFI, such as ACPI.

I don't understand your Kconfig setup. Why don't you just have one
option (the one from patch 2/3), instead of adding 2 different but
similarly named options?

>  config CC_HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR_TLS
>  	def_bool $(cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=tls -mstack-protector-guard-reg=tp -mstack-protector-guard-offset=0)
>  
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> index f71ce21ff684..f9d1625dd159 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>  /* Basic configuration for ACPI */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  
> +#include <asm/ffi.h>
> +
>  typedef u64 phys_cpuid_t;
>  #define PHYS_CPUID_INVALID INVALID_HARTID
>  
> @@ -66,6 +68,13 @@ int acpi_get_riscv_isa(struct acpi_table_header *table,
>  		       unsigned int cpu, const char **isa);
>  
>  static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
> +
> +#define ACPI_HAVE_ARCH_GET_ROOT_POINTER

How come this is not set in Kconfig like HAVE_FOO options usually are?

> +static inline u64 acpi_arch_get_root_pointer(void)
> +{
> +	return acpi_rsdp;
> +}
> +
>  #else
>  static inline void acpi_init_rintc_map(void) { }
>  static inline struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu)
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ffi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ffi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..847af02abd87
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ffi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +#ifndef _ASM_FFI_H
> +#define _ASM_FFI_H
> +
> +extern u64 acpi_rsdp;

/stuff/linux/drivers/acpi/osl.c:178:22: error: redefinition of 'acpi_rsdp' with a different type: 'unsigned long' vs 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long')

Fails to build when Kexec is enabled.

> +extern void ffi_init(void);
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_FFI_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> index 506cc4a9a45a..274e06f4da33 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_CORE)	+= crash_core.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)	+= jump_label.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)		+= efi.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_FFI)              += ffi.o

This file uses tabs for alignment, not spaces.

>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= compat_syscall_table.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= compat_signal.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= compat_vdso/
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ffi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ffi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c5ac2b5d9148
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ffi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * ffi.c - FDT FIRMWARE INTERFACE
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> +#include <linux/libfdt.h>
> +
> +u64 acpi_rsdp;
> +
> +void __init ffi_acpi_root_pointer(void)
> +{
> +	int cfgtbl, len;
> +	fdt64_t *prop;
> +
> +	cfgtbl = fdt_path_offset(initial_boot_params, "/cfgtables");
> +	if (cfgtbl < 0) {
> +		pr_info("firmware table not found.\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	prop = fdt_getprop_w(initial_boot_params, cfgtbl, "acpi_phy_ptr", &len);
> +	if (!prop || len != sizeof(u64))
> +		pr_info("acpi_rsdp not found.\n");
> +	else
> +		acpi_rsdp = fdt64_to_cpu(*prop);
> +
> +	pr_debug("acpi rsdp: %llx\n", acpi_rsdp);

Same comments here about undocumented DT properties and pr_*()s that
likely are not wanted (or correct).

> +}
> +
> +void __init ffi_init(void)
> +{
> +	ffi_acpi_root_pointer();

What happens if, on a system with "normal" ACPI support, ffi_init() is
called & ffi_acpi_root_pointer() calls things like fdt_path_offset()?

> +}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 971fe776e2f8..5a933d6b6acb 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  #include <asm/thread_info.h>
>  #include <asm/kasan.h>
>  #include <asm/efi.h>
> +#include <asm/ffi.h>
>  
>  #include "head.h"
>  
> @@ -279,6 +280,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  	parse_early_param();
>  
>  	efi_init();
> +	ffi_init();

What provides ffi_init() if CONFIG_FFI is disabled?

>  	paging_init();
>  
>  	/* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time configuration */

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists