linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 17/18] sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPnZJGB6gk47Hw-OE2_9eSKJ0DwOzEiL+tncMJyiOD6arw6xag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 2 Jul 2023 20:54:47 +0300
From:   Askar Safin <safinaskar@...il.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        dccp@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-x25@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
        rds-devel@....oracle.com, tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 17/18] sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)

> -/* In some cases, both sendpage() and sendmsg() could have added
> - * an skb to the write queue, but failed adding payload on it.
> - * We need to remove it to consume less memory, but more
> - * importantly be able to generate EPOLLOUT for Edge Trigger epoll()
> - * users.
> +/* In some cases, both sendmsg() could have added an skb to the write queue,
> + * but failed adding payload on it.  We need to remove it to consume less
> + * memory, but more importantly be able to generate EPOLLOUT for Edge Trigger
> + * epoll() users.
>   */

There is a typo here. "Both" is redundant now

-- 
Askar Safin