[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230702-pll-mipi_set_rate_parent-v3-1-46dcb8aa9cbc@oltmanns.dev>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2023 19:55:20 +0200
From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Roman Beranek <me@...y.cz>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/8] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: consider alternative parent
rates when determining rate
In case the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag is set, consider using a different
parent rate when determining a new rate.
To find the best match for the requested rate, perform the following
steps for each NKM combination:
- calculate the optimal parent rate,
- find the best parent rate that the parent clock actually supports
- use that parent rate to calculate the effective rate.
In case the clk does not support setting the parent rate, use the same
algorithm as before.
Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
index a0978a50edae..d83843e69c25 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/math.h>
#include "ccu_gate.h"
#include "ccu_nkm.h"
@@ -16,6 +17,44 @@ struct _ccu_nkm {
unsigned long m, min_m, max_m;
};
+static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(unsigned long *parent, unsigned long rate,
+ struct _ccu_nkm *nkm, struct clk_hw *phw)
+{
+ unsigned long best_rate = 0, best_parent_rate = *parent, tmp_parent = *parent;
+ unsigned long best_n = 0, best_k = 0, best_m = 0;
+ unsigned long _n, _k, _m;
+
+ for (_k = nkm->min_k; _k <= nkm->max_k; _k++) {
+ for (_n = nkm->min_n; _n <= nkm->max_n; _n++) {
+ for (_m = nkm->min_m; _m <= nkm->max_m; _m++) {
+ unsigned long tmp_rate;
+
+ tmp_parent = clk_hw_round_rate(phw, rate * _m / (_n * _k));
+
+ tmp_rate = tmp_parent * _n * _k / _m;
+ if (tmp_rate > rate)
+ continue;
+
+ if ((rate - tmp_rate) < (rate - best_rate)) {
+ best_rate = tmp_rate;
+ best_parent_rate = tmp_parent;
+ best_n = _n;
+ best_k = _k;
+ best_m = _m;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ nkm->n = best_n;
+ nkm->k = best_k;
+ nkm->m = best_m;
+
+ *parent = best_parent_rate;
+
+ return best_rate;
+}
+
static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
struct _ccu_nkm *nkm)
{
@@ -106,7 +145,7 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
}
static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct ccu_mux_internal *mux,
- struct clk_hw *hw,
+ struct clk_hw *parent_hw,
unsigned long *parent_rate,
unsigned long rate,
void *data)
@@ -124,7 +163,10 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct ccu_mux_internal *mux,
if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
rate *= nkm->fixed_post_div;
- rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+ if (!clk_hw_can_set_rate_parent(&nkm->common.hw))
+ rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+ else
+ rate = ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm, parent_hw);
if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
rate /= nkm->fixed_post_div;
@@ -159,7 +201,7 @@ static int ccu_nkm_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
_nkm.min_m = 1;
_nkm.max_m = nkm->m.max ?: 1 << nkm->m.width;
- ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+ ccu_nkm_find_best(&parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
spin_lock_irqsave(nkm->common.lock, flags);
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists