linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.4 10/16] s390/boot: fix physmem_info virtual vs physical address confusion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230702193815.1775684-10-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun,  2 Jul 2023 15:38:09 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.4 10/16] s390/boot: fix physmem_info virtual vs physical address confusion

From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit c70505434c8defb111326a143e2dd2be09778593 ]

Fix virtual vs physical address confusion (which currently are the same).

Reviewed-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/physmem_info.h | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/physmem_info.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/physmem_info.h
index 8e9c582592b3f..9e41a74fce9ac 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/physmem_info.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/physmem_info.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #define _ASM_S390_MEM_DETECT_H
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <asm/page.h>
 
 enum physmem_info_source {
 	MEM_DETECT_NONE = 0,
@@ -133,7 +134,7 @@ static inline const char *get_rr_type_name(enum reserved_range_type t)
 
 #define for_each_physmem_reserved_type_range(t, range, p_start, p_end)				\
 	for (range = &physmem_info.reserved[t], *p_start = range->start, *p_end = range->end;	\
-	     range && range->end; range = range->chain,						\
+	     range && range->end; range = range->chain ? __va(range->chain) : NULL,		\
 	     *p_start = range ? range->start : 0, *p_end = range ? range->end : 0)
 
 static inline struct reserved_range *__physmem_reserved_next(enum reserved_range_type *t,
@@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ static inline struct reserved_range *__physmem_reserved_next(enum reserved_range
 			return range;
 	}
 	if (range->chain)
-		return range->chain;
+		return __va(range->chain);
 	while (++*t < RR_MAX) {
 		range = &physmem_info.reserved[*t];
 		if (range->end)
-- 
2.39.2