linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/adreno: Assign revn to A635

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA8EJpripp+Hf=GvCit75naGQqK8owHzPb+VuYHin393HcFPwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 2 Jul 2023 03:24:24 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/adreno: Assign revn to A635

On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 at 18:50, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 4:12 PM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Recently, a WARN_ON() was introduced to ensure that revn is filled before
> > adreno_is_aXYZ is called. This however doesn't work very well when revn is
> > 0 by design (such as for A635). Fill it in as a stopgap solution for
> > -fixes.
> >
> > Fixes: cc943f43ece7 ("drm/msm/adreno: warn if chip revn is verified before being set")
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - add fixes
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230628-topic-a635-v1-1-5056e09c08fb@linaro.org
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > index cb94cfd137a8..8ea7eae9fc52 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
> >                 .address_space_size = SZ_16G,
> >         }, {
> >                 .rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 3, 5, ANY_ID),
> > +               .revn = 635,
> >                 .fw = {
> >                         [ADRENO_FW_SQE] = "a660_sqe.fw",
> >                         [ADRENO_FW_GMU] = "a660_gmu.bin",
> >
>
> hmm, I realized a problem with this, it would change what
> MSM_PARAM_GPU_ID and more importantly MSM_PARAM_CHIP_ID return..  The
> former should be "harmless", although it isn't a good idea for uabi
> changes to be a side effect of a fix.  The latter is more problematic.

I'd say MSM_PARAM_GPU_ID is broken for 635 anyway (won't it return 0
in this case)?
So the new value should be correct.

But more importantly, why are we exporting speedbin in
MSM_PARAM_CHIP_ID only if there is no revn? And why are we exporting
the speedbin at all as a part of CHIP_ID?

>
> I think I'm leaning more towards reverting commit cc943f43ece7
> ("drm/msm/adreno: warn if chip revn is verified before being set") for
> -fixes.  I'm still thinking about options for a longer term fix.
>
> BR,
> -R
>
>
> > ---
> > base-commit: 5c875096d59010cee4e00da1f9c7bdb07a025dc2
> > change-id: 20230628-topic-a635-1b3c2c987417
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> >



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry