[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec3f0f2d-c8d4-3df7-7ff4-5c841a050be3@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 16:42:46 +0300
From: "naamax.meir" <naamax.meir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Florian Kauer <florian.kauer@...utronix.de>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...ux.intel.com>,
Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>,
Aravindhan Gunasekaran <aravindhan.gunasekaran@...el.com>,
Malli C <mallikarjuna.chilakala@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kurt@...utronix.de,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 1/6] igc: Rename qbv_enable to
taprio_offload_enable
On 6/19/2023 13:08, Florian Kauer wrote:
> In the current implementation the flags adapter->qbv_enable
> and IGC_FLAG_TSN_QBV_ENABLED have a similar name, but do not
> have the same meaning. The first one is used only to indicate
> taprio offload (i.e. when igc_save_qbv_schedule was called),
> while the second one corresponds to the Qbv mode of the hardware.
> However, the second one is also used to support the TX launchtime
> feature, i.e. ETF qdisc offload. This leads to situations where
> adapter->qbv_enable is false, but the flag IGC_FLAG_TSN_QBV_ENABLED
> is set. This is prone to confusion.
>
> The rename should reduce this confusion. Since it is a pure
> rename, it has no impact on functionality.
>
> Fixes: e17090eb2494 ("igc: allow BaseTime 0 enrollment for Qbv")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Kauer <florian.kauer@...utronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Tested-by: Naama Meir <naamax.meir@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists