lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <exbq2w5c2ny24pxjprhiozbcaftqwumq6o4cvq2sjy6bqi4lvi@nqkeh2vs5seu>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2023 08:18:37 +0200
From:   Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To:     Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Cc:     "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
        Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro@...tmail.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v2 0/3] More fixes for FC enabling

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:43:01AM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2023 / 17:16, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > I (think) address all the feedback I got from Sagi and Shinichiro except one.
> > The _have_nvme_cli_context() (previously _nvme_cli_support_context()) function
> > is still there. I didn't find any other good way to achieve this and I found in
> > blktests another function doing the same: _have_fio_zbd_zonemode().
> 
> I found that the latest blktests fix for the hostnqn/hostid issue created
> conflict with the 2nd patch in this series. Sorry about that. (Actually, I guess
> this series could be enough for the issue...)

No problem.

> Daniel, I can fix the conflict and repost the series to the list. Or you can fix
> the conflict by yourself. Please let me know your preference.

I'll rebase and fixup the conflict. Also give it another quick test run just to
make sure all still works.

> Other than that, I think the three patches are good enough to apply.

Great!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ