[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230703063713.GA3012709@ik1-406-35019.vs.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 15:37:13 +0900
From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, naoya.horiguchi@....com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memory-failure: fix potential page refcnt leak in
memory_failure()
On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 03:28:37PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> put_ref_page() is not called to drop extra refcnt when comes from madvise
> in the case pfn is valid but pgmap is NULL leading to page refcnt leak.
Is this test scenario realistic one? I don't think that we can call madvise() for
such a device memory page. If this is the case, this issue can be thought as
potentioal one (so no need to send to stable).
>
> Fixes: 1e8aaedb182d ("mm,memory_failure: always pin the page in madvise_inject_error")
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Anyway, the patch looks good to me. Thanks you.
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index e245191e6b04..65e2d4c5b50d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2080,8 +2080,6 @@ static int memory_failure_dev_pagemap(unsigned long pfn, int flags,
> {
> int rc = -ENXIO;
>
> - put_ref_page(pfn, flags);
> -
> /* device metadata space is not recoverable */
> if (!pgmap_pfn_valid(pgmap, pfn))
> goto out;
> @@ -2157,6 +2155,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>
> if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
> pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn, NULL);
> + put_ref_page(pfn, flags);
> if (pgmap) {
> res = memory_failure_dev_pagemap(pfn, flags,
> pgmap);
> --
> 2.33.0
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists