[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878rbxs5r8.fsf@oltmanns.dev>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 11:28:59 +0200
From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Roman Beranek <me@...y.cz>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: select closest rate for
pll-video0
On 2023-07-03 at 09:50:05 +0200, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> wrote:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
>> @@ -541,7 +542,7 @@ static const char * const tcon1_parents[] = { "pll-video0", "pll-video1" };
>> static const u8 tcon1_table[] = { 0, 2, };
>> static struct ccu_div tcon1_clk = {
>> .enable = BIT(31),
>> - .div = _SUNXI_CCU_DIV(0, 4),
>> + .div = _SUNXI_CCU_DIV_FLAGS(0, 4, CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST),
>> .mux = _SUNXI_CCU_MUX_TABLE(24, 2, tcon1_table),
>> .common = {
>> .reg = 0x11c,
>> @@ -549,6 +550,7 @@ static struct ccu_div tcon1_clk = {
>> tcon1_parents,
>> &ccu_div_ops,
>> CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT),
>> + .features = CCU_FEATURE_CLOSEST_RATE,
>> },
>> };
>
> I'm not super comfortable with having to set it twice for dividers (or
> composite clocks). Could we set CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST automatically
> if CCU_FEATURE_CLOSEST_RATE is set?
You're of course right. If I'm not mistaken, I can use
SUNXI_CCU_M_WITH_MUX_TABLE_GATE_CLOSEST that I introduced in div patch
(PATCH 7). Otherwise I'll create a similar macro for use with tcon1.
>
> I'm guessing we would need it for muxes as well?
>
Yes, it's already in the mux and div patches.
Best regards,
Frank
>
> Maxime
>
> [[End of PGP Signed Part]]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists