[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230703094752.79269-23-byungchul@sk.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 18:47:49 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel_team@...ynix.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, will@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
sashal@...nel.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, duyuyang@...il.com,
johannes.berg@...el.com, tj@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
willy@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com, amir73il@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-team@....com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
minchan@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
sj@...nel.org, jglisse@...hat.com, dennis@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
ngupta@...are.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
josef@...icpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, jlayton@...nel.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, hch@...radead.org, djwong@...nel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com,
melissa.srw@...il.com, hamohammed.sa@...il.com,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com, chris.p.wilson@...el.com,
gwan-gyeong.mun@...el.com, max.byungchul.park@...il.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, longman@...hat.com, hdanton@...a.com,
her0gyugyu@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v10 rebased on v6.4 22/25] dept: Apply timeout consideration to dma fence wait
Now that CONFIG_DEPT_AGGRESSIVE_TIMEOUT_WAIT was introduced, apply the
consideration to dma fence wait.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
index ad2d7a94c868..ab10b228a147 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait(struct dma_fence *fence, bool intr, signed long timeout)
cb.task = current;
list_add(&cb.base.node, &fence->cb_list);
- sdt_might_sleep_start(NULL);
+ sdt_might_sleep_start_timeout(NULL, timeout);
while (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags) && ret > 0) {
if (intr)
__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout(struct dma_fence **fences, uint32_t count,
}
}
- sdt_might_sleep_start(NULL);
+ sdt_might_sleep_start_timeout(NULL, timeout);
while (ret > 0) {
if (intr)
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists