linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: dwc: Add TDM mode support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2023 12:53:26 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: dwc: Add TDM mode support

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 09:16:06AM +0300, Maxim Kochetkov wrote:
> On 22.06.2023 23:00, Maxim Kochetkov wrote:
> > Depending on hardware implementaion of DWC I2S controller may support
> > TDM mode if enabled in SoC at design time.
> > Unfortunately there is no way to detect TDM capability for DWC by
> > reading registers. Anyway, if such capability enabled, TDM mode
> > can be enabled and configured by dai-tdm-slot-* DT options.

> Do we need some extra steps to upstream this patch?

We're in the merge window...

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)