[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230703120331.2384427-1-aliceryhl@google.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 12:03:31 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: benno.lossin@...ton.me
Cc: alex.gaynor@...il.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
lina@...hilina.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nmi@...aspace.dk,
ojeda@...nel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, wedsonaf@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] rust: init: Add functions to create array initializers
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me> writes:
> Add two functions `pin_init_array_from_fn` and `init_array_from_fn` that
> take a function that generates initializers for `T` from usize, the added
> functions then return an initializer for `[T; N]` where every element is
> initialized by an element returned from the generator function.
>
> Suggested-by: Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
> ---
> +/// Initializes an array by initializing each element via the provided initializer.
> +///
> +/// # Examples
> +///
> +/// ```rust
> +/// let array: Box<[usize; 1000_000_000]>= Box::init(init_array_from_fn(|i| i)).unwrap();
> +/// println!("{array:?}");
> +/// ```
> +pub fn init_array_from_fn<I, const N: usize, T, E>(
> + mut make_init: impl FnMut(usize) -> I,
> +) -> impl Init<[T; N], E>
> +where
> + I: Init<T, E>,
> +{
> + let init = move |slot: *mut [T; N]| {
> + let slot = slot.cast::<T>();
> + for i in 0..N {
> + let init = make_init(i);
> + // SAFETY: since 0 <= `i` < N, it is still in bounds of `[T; N]`.
> + let ptr = unsafe { slot.add(i) };
> + // SAFETY: The pointer is derived from `slot` and thus satisfies the `__init`
> + // requirements.
> + match unsafe { init.__init(ptr) } {
> + Ok(()) => {}
> + Err(e) => {
> + // We now free every element that has been initialized before:
> + for j in 0..i {
> + let ptr = unsafe { slot.add(j) };
> + // SAFETY: The value was initialized in a previous iteration of the loop
> + // and since we return `Err` below, the caller will consider the memory at
> + // `slot` as uninitialized.
> + unsafe { ptr::drop_in_place(ptr) };
> + }
The loop can be simplified like this:
ptr::drop_in_place(ptr::slice_from_raw_parts(slot, i));
Yes, this actually works and will run the destructor of each value.
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists