[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230703121411.69606-6-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 15:14:11 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] ACPI: scan: Provide symbol declarations
Compiler is not happy about a couple of symbols that, it thinks,
are not declared:
warning: symbol 'acpi_device_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'acpi_wakeup_device_list' was not declared. Should it be static?
Include "sleep.h" to have them explicitly declared and make
the compiler happy.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index ec1c9bec8bae..5b145f1aaa1b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/dma-direct.h>
#include "internal.h"
+#include "sleep.h"
#define ACPI_BUS_CLASS "system_bus"
#define ACPI_BUS_HID "LNXSYBUS"
--
2.40.0.1.gaa8946217a0b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists