[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230703-6ac90a2de15f1017bc0ced74@orel>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 16:17:07 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: 运辉崔 <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
Cc: ardb@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
rminnich@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, jdelvare@...e.com,
yc.hung@...iatek.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
tinghan.shen@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, geshijian@...edance.com,
weidong.wd@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: obtain ACPI RSDP from FFI.
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 09:30:10PM +0800, 运辉崔 wrote:
> Hi drew,
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 9:01 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > (This is a reply to a non-existent cover letter.)
>
> This has been discussed many times with Ard, Please refer to :
> https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/20230426034001.16-1-cuiyunhui@bytedance.com/
There's nothing in that thread that convinces me this is a good idea.
Indeed, afaict from that thread, Ard nacked this. It was only when it
was suggested that arch/riscv would own the code, that he stopped
complaining about it. I wouldn't call that an endorsement.
Thanks,
drew
>
>
> > I'm not a big fan of adding yet another interface. Have you considered
> > doing something like [1]?
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UefiPayloadPkg
> >
> > Thanks,
> > drew
>
> Thanks,
> Yunhui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists