linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.4 00/28] 6.4.1-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2a2387bf-f589-6856-3583-d3d848a17d34@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sun, 2 Jul 2023 21:46:26 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Helge Deller <deller@....de>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-parisc <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.4 00/28] 6.4.1-rc1 review - hppa argument list too long

On 7/2/23 21:22, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 at 20:23, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> I can reproduce the problem in qemu. However, I do not see a warning
>> after applying your patch.
> 
> Funky, funky.
> 
> I'm assuming it's the
> 
>                                  page = get_arg_page(bprm, pos, 1);
>                                  if (!page) {
>                                          ret = -E2BIG;
>                                          goto out;
>                                  }
> 
> in copy_strings() that causes this. Or possibly, the version in
> copy_string_kernel().
> 
> Does *this* get that "pr_warn()" printout (and a stack trace once,
> just for good measure)?
> 

Sorry, you lost me. Isn't that the same patch as before ? Or
is it just time for me to go to bed ?

Guenter