[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d468d08-6410-e424-b4f3-5245cdb0334a@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 16:59:45 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, lee@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
sboyd@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domains for SDX75
On 3.07.2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 +
> include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> index afad313..58e1be8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties:
> - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd
> - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd
> - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd
> + - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd
> - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd
> - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd
> - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
> #define SDX65_CX_AO 4
> #define SDX65_MXC 5
>
> +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */
> +#define SDX75_CX 0
> +#define SDX75_CX_AO 1
> +#define SDX75_MSS 2
> +#define SDX75_MX 3
> +#define SDX75_MX_AO 4
> +#define SDX75_MXC 5
Please instead introduce a set of defines without the SoC prefix
(i.e. CX, CX_AO, MX etc.). We've been putting this off for too long
and you're the first unlucky guy that submitted new RPMhPD support after
we've concluded it'd be the way to go! :D Sadly, we can't replace the
existing ones retroactively..
Konrad
> +
> /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */
> #define SM6350_CX 0
> #define SM6350_GFX 1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists