[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f97e8c26-1379-dabc-21af-ebf4b06b31e7@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 19:01:31 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: powermac: Use of_get_cpu_hwid() to read CPU node
'reg'
Le 03/07/2023 à 07:26, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:59:31 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Replace open coded reading of CPU nodes' "reg" properties with
>> of_get_cpu_hwid() dedicated for this purpose.
>>
>>
>
> Applied to powerpc/next.
>
> [1/1] powerpc: powermac: Use of_get_cpu_hwid() to read CPU node 'reg'
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/bc1cf75027585f8d87f94e464ee5909acf885a8c
>
> cheers
>
Hi,
I guess, that it does not really matter, but shouldn't the
of_node_put() be *after* the "reset_io = *rst;" statements to be
absolutely safe?
(This change is in my backlog and I have apparently never proposed it)
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists