[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <090cc065-b078-4f2c-9b2d-3b0b7418461d@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 18:58:55 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, tfiga@...omium.org,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, festevam@...il.com, nicoleotsuka@...il.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] media: v4l2: Add audio capture and output support
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 03:12:55PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> My main concern is that these cross-subsystem drivers are a pain to
> maintain. So there have to be good reasons to do this.
> Also it is kind of weird to have to use the V4L2 API in userspace to
> deal with a specific audio conversion. Quite unexpected.
> But in the end, that's a decision I can't make.
> So I wait for that feedback. Note that if the decision is made that this
> can use V4L2, then there is quite a lot more that needs to be done:
> documentation, new compliance tests, etc. It's adding a new API, and that
> comes with additional work...
Absolutely, I agree with all of this - my impression was that the target
here would be bypass of audio streams to/from a v4l2 device, without
bouncing through an application layer. If it's purely for audio usage
with no other tie to v4l2 then involving v4l2 does just seem like
complication.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists