[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19b2d721-06a3-bc17-eb81-18ee2d8856a3@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 20:23:30 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: at91: constify at91_twi_pdata
On 30/06/2023 00:38, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> [...]
>
>> -static struct at91_twi_pdata *at91_twi_get_driver_data(
>> +static const struct at91_twi_pdata *at91_twi_get_driver_data(
>> struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
>> @@ -189,9 +189,9 @@ static struct at91_twi_pdata *at91_twi_get_driver_data(
>> match = of_match_node(atmel_twi_dt_ids, pdev->dev.of_node);
>> if (!match)
>> return NULL;
>> - return (struct at91_twi_pdata *)match->data;
>> + return match->data;
>> }
>> - return (struct at91_twi_pdata *) platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
>> + return (const void *) platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
>
> the const's always confuse me... do you get an error here? Is
> this cast really needed?
I think this change is not necessary and actually should not matter. See
for example drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c after my refactorings in
commit 3aec40096550 ("tty: serial: samsung: reduce number of casts").
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists