[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1j352378zh.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 21:43:41 +0200
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, khilman@...libre.com,
martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com
Cc: jian.hu@...ogic.com, kernel@...rdevices.ru, rockosov@...il.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jan Dakinevich <yvdakinevich@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] clk: meson: change usleep_range() to udelay() for
atomic context
On Mon 03 Jul 2023 at 23:04, Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
> The function meson_clk_pll_enable() can be invoked under the enable_lock
> spinlock from the clk core logic
---
> (please refer to
> drivers/clk/clk.c:clk_core_enable_lock()), which risks a kernel panic
> during the usleep_range() call:
>
This part of the comment is not very useful - please drop it
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u4:2/36/0x00000002
> Modules linked in: g_ffs usb_f_fs libcomposite
> CPU: 1 PID: 36 Comm: kworker/u4:2 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc5 #273
> Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> Call trace:
> dump_backtrace+0x9c/0x128
> show_stack+0x20/0x38
> dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x60
> dump_stack+0x18/0x28
> __schedule_bug+0x58/0x78
> __schedule+0x828/0xa88
> schedule+0x64/0xd8
> schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0xd0/0x208
> schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x1c/0x30
> usleep_range_state+0x6c/0xa8
> meson_clk_pll_enable+0x1f4/0x310
> clk_core_enable+0x78/0x200
> clk_core_enable+0x58/0x200
> clk_core_enable+0x58/0x200
> clk_core_enable+0x58/0x200
> clk_enable+0x34/0x60
>
> Considering that this code is expected to be used in an atomic context,
> it is required to use the udelay() function instead of usleep_range()
> for the atomic context safety.
Please use an imperative form, instructing the code to change
>
> Fixes: b6ec400aa153 ("clk: meson: introduce new pll power-on sequence for A1 SoC family")
> Reported-by: Jan Dakinevich <yvdakinevich@...rdevices.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Dakinevich <yvdakinevich@...rdevices.ru>
The tags are confusing here
I suppose a 2 lines change has not be been written with 4 hands ;)
If Jan just reported and you made the change then drop his signed-off
If he did the job, then drop the reported-by and change the author
> ---
> drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c
> index 56ec2210f1ad..eef6f37c8d8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c
> @@ -367,9 +367,9 @@ static int meson_clk_pll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> * 3. enable the lock detect module
> */
> if (MESON_PARM_APPLICABLE(&pll->current_en)) {
> - usleep_range(10, 20);
> + udelay(10);
> meson_parm_write(clk->map, &pll->current_en, 1);
> - usleep_range(40, 50);
> + udelay(40);
> };
>
> if (MESON_PARM_APPLICABLE(&pll->l_detect)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists