[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85456057-c4ef-68a6-4fc5-c9fd03b01b71@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 11:47:40 +0530
From: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <lee@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domains for SDX75
On 7/3/2023 8:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 3.07.2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>> Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 +
>> include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 8 ++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>> index afad313..58e1be8 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties:
>> - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd
>> - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd
>> - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd
>> + - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd
>> - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd
>> - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd
>> - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>> index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
>> #define SDX65_CX_AO 4
>> #define SDX65_MXC 5
>>
>> +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */
>> +#define SDX75_CX 0
>> +#define SDX75_CX_AO 1
>> +#define SDX75_MSS 2
>> +#define SDX75_MX 3
>> +#define SDX75_MX_AO 4
>> +#define SDX75_MXC 5
> Please instead introduce a set of defines without the SoC prefix
> (i.e. CX, CX_AO, MX etc.). We've been putting this off for too long
> and you're the first unlucky guy that submitted new RPMhPD support after
> we've concluded it'd be the way to go! :D Sadly, we can't replace the
> existing ones retroactively..
Surely No issues. Will update it.
Thanks,
Rohit.
> Konrad
>> +
>> /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */
>> #define SM6350_CX 0
>> #define SM6350_GFX 1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists