[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87edloyuri.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 09:56:49 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] fbdev: Split frame buffer support in FB and
FB_CORE symbols
Hello Andy,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:05:28AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Currently the CONFIG_FB option has to be enabled even if no legacy fbdev
>> drivers are needed (e.g: only to have support for framebuffer consoles).
>>
>> The DRM subsystem has a fbdev emulation layer, but depends on CONFIG_FB
>> and so it can only be enabled if that dependency is enabled as well.
>>
>> That means fbdev drivers have to be explicitly disabled if users want to
>> enable CONFIG_FB, only to use fbcon and/or the DRM fbdev emulation layer.
>>
>> This patch introduces a non-visible CONFIG_FB_CORE symbol that could be
>> enabled just to have core support needed for CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION,
>> allowing CONFIG_FB to be disabled (and automatically disabling all the
>> fbdev drivers).
>>
>> Nothing from fb_backlight.o and fbmon.o is used by the DRM fbdev emulation
>> layer so these two objects can be compiled out when CONFIG_FB is disabled.
>
> ...
>
> Wondering if
>
> if FB_CORE
> ...
> endif
>
> makes Kconfig looking better instead of replacing all these "depends on" lines.
>
Yes, I discussed that with Arnd and he said that the if / endif is just
syntax sugar so I didn't do that change to keep the patches simpler. But
is something that you could change as a follow-up if you prefer that way.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists