| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZKPUQFMoDQFrFr2d@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 16:11:44 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: "chenjiahao (C)" <chenjiahao16@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, guoren@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
bjorn@...osinc.com, alex@...ti.fr, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
atishp@...osinc.com, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v6 1/2] riscv: kdump: Implement
crashkernel=X,[high,low]
On 07/04/23 at 10:18am, chenjiahao (C) wrote:
>
> On 2023/7/2 12:12, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 07/01/23 at 05:11pm, Chen Jiahao wrote:
> > > On riscv, the current crash kernel allocation logic is trying to
> > > allocate within 32bit addressible memory region by default, if
> > > failed, try to allocate without 4G restriction.
> > >
> > > In need of saving DMA zone memory while allocating a relatively large
> > > crash kernel region, allocating the reserved memory top down in
> > > high memory, without overlapping the DMA zone, is a mature solution.
> > > Here introduce the parameter option crashkernel=X,[high,low].
> > >
> > > One can reserve the crash kernel from high memory above DMA zone range
> > > by explicitly passing "crashkernel=X,high"; or reserve a memory range
> > > below 4G with "crashkernel=X,low".
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@...wei.com>
> > > Acked-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 5 +++
> > > arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > index 971fe776e2f8..376f5d49ce85 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > @@ -178,6 +178,11 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > goto error;
> > > }
> > > + if (crashk_low_res.start != crashk_low_res.end) {
> > > + ret = add_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + goto error;
> > > + }
> > > #endif
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > > index 4b95d8999120..eeb31c2cc843 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > > @@ -1298,6 +1298,28 @@ static inline void setup_vm_final(void)
> > > }
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
> > > +/* Reserve 128M low memory by default for swiotlb buffer */
> > > +#define DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE (128UL << 20)
> > > +
> > > +static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(unsigned long long low_size)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned long long low_base;
> > > +
> > > + low_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(low_size, PMD_SIZE, 0, dma32_phys_limit);
> > > + if (!low_base) {
> > > + pr_err("cannot allocate crashkernel low memory (size:0x%llx).\n", low_size);
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + pr_info("crashkernel low memory reserved: 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
> > > + low_base, low_base + low_size, low_size >> 20);
> > > +
> > > + crashk_low_res.start = low_base;
> > > + crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
> > > *
> > > @@ -1309,8 +1331,12 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> > > {
> > > unsigned long long crash_base = 0;
> > > unsigned long long crash_size = 0;
> > > + unsigned long long crash_low_size = 0;
> > > unsigned long search_start = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
> > > - unsigned long search_end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
> > > + unsigned long search_end = (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit;
> > > + char *cmdline = boot_command_line;
> > > + bool fixed_base = false;
> > > + bool high = false;
> > > int ret = 0;
> > > @@ -1326,14 +1352,36 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > - ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
> > > + ret = parse_crashkernel(cmdline, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
> > > &crash_size, &crash_base);
> > > - if (ret || !crash_size)
> > > + if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> > > + /* Fallback to crashkernel=X,[high,low] */
> > > + ret = parse_crashkernel_high(cmdline, 0, &crash_size, &crash_base);
> > > + if (ret || !crash_size)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * crashkernel=Y,low is valid only when crashkernel=X,high
> > > + * is passed.
> > > + */
> > > + ret = parse_crashkernel_low(cmdline, 0, &crash_low_size, &crash_base);
> > > + if (ret == -ENOENT)
> > > + crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> > > + else if (ret)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + search_start = (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit;
> > > + search_end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
> > > + high = true;
> > > + } else if (ret || !crash_size) {
> > > + /* Invalid argument value specified */
> > > return;
> > > + }
> > > crash_size = PAGE_ALIGN(crash_size);
> > > if (crash_base) {
> > > + fixed_base = true;
> > > search_start = crash_base;
> > > search_end = crash_base + crash_size;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1346,17 +1394,39 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> > > * swiotlb can work on the crash kernel.
> > > */
> > > crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
> > > - search_start,
> > > - min(search_end, (unsigned long) SZ_4G));
> > > + search_start, search_end);
> > > if (crash_base == 0) {
> > > - /* Try again without restricting region to 32bit addressible memory */
> > > + if (fixed_base) {
> > > + pr_warn("crashkernel: allocating failed with given size@...set\n");
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (high) {
> > > + /* Fall back to lower 32G reservation */
> > > + search_start = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
> > > + search_end = (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit;
> > > + } else {
> > > + /* Try again above the region of 32bit addressible memory */
> > > + search_start = (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit;
> > > + search_end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
> > > - search_start, search_end);
> > > + search_start, search_end);
> > > if (crash_base == 0) {
> > > pr_warn("crashkernel: couldn't allocate %lldKB\n",
> > > crash_size >> 10);
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > +
> > > + if (!crash_low_size)
> > > + crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> > How do you differentiate the case user specifies crashkernel=0M,low
> > explicitly with the case that user doesn't specify crashkernel=,low, but
> > only specify crsahkernel=xM,high? I saw you don't have the test case
> > crashkernel=xM,high crashkernel=0M,low listed in your cover letter.
>
> Yes, here is indeed a point not exactly aligned with Arm64 code.
> But testcases below seem to have the same result with Arm64:
>
> crashkernel=512M,high //high=512M, low=128M (default)
> crashkernel=512M,high crashkernel=0M,low //high=512M, low=0M
> crashkernel=512M,high crashkernel=256M,low //high=512M, low=256M
>
>
> When the first allocation succeed, it will not fallback into
> the if (crash_base == 0) case, the allocation result is the same
> as Arm64, both for explicitly given "crashkernel=0M,low" or not.
>
> The problem you mentioned might occurs when the first allocation
> failed.
>
> My logic here is when crashkernel=xM,high is specified, no matter
> crashkernel=0M,low is explicitly given or not, "high" flag is set.
> It will fallback to lower 4G allocation, additional lower 4G region
> with "crash_low_size" will never get reserved.
Ah, you are right. I was mistaken. crashkernel=xM,high crashkernel=0,low
works correctly with your v6 patch. I am fine if you want to take a
different code flow to implement, as long as the actual result is the
same. I personally would make the code logic the same as arm64. So this
patches looks good to me.
>
> So the results between Arm64 and riscv when crashkernel=,low is
> specified or not are the same. Is there any problem with my logic,
> or have I misunderstood your comment above?
>
> >
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if ((crash_base >= dma32_phys_limit) && crash_low_size &&
> > > + reserve_crashkernel_low(crash_low_size)) {
>
> Here, additional lower memory region will not reserve when
> crashkernel=xM,high is given
>
> > > + memblock_phys_free(crash_base, crash_size);
> > > + return;
> > > }
> > > pr_info("crashkernel: reserved 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> Thanks,
>
> Jiahao
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists