[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11052797-b006-11bb-e4eb-987ddd568b24@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 10:48:45 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, amitk@...nel.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, mmayer@...adcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
bchihi@...libre.com, wenst@...omium.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] genirq/devres: Add
devm_request_threaded_irq_emsg()
On 03/07/2023 19:43, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 02:31:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/07/2023 11:04, Yangtao Li wrote:
>>> There are more than 700 calls to the devm_request_threaded_irq method.
>>> Most drivers only request one interrupt resource, and these error
>>> messages are basically the same. If error messages are printed
>>> everywhere, more than 1000 lines of code can be saved by removing the
>>> msg in the driver.
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> +int devm_request_threaded_irq_emsg(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
>>> + irq_handler_t handler, irq_handler_t thread_fn,
>>> + unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname,
>>> + void *dev_id, const char *emsg)
>>> +{
>>> + int rc;
>>> +
>>> + rc = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, handler, NULL, irqflags,
>>> + devname, dev_id);
>>> + if (rc && rc != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to request %sinterrupt %u %s %s: %pe\n",
>>> + thread_fn ? "threaded " : "", irq, devname ? : dev_name(dev),
>>> + emsg ? : "", ERR_PTR(rc));
>>
>> It is open-coding dev_err_probe(). Just use dev_err_probe instead.
>
> dev_err_probe is supposed to be only called in probe functions, while
> devm_request_threaded_irq might be called in other contexts (e.g. when a
> device is opened). That's why I asked to not use dev_err_probe() in v2
True, but then all the callers of this function will forget to set
deferred probe reason.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists