lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2023 10:48:45 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
        rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, amitk@...nel.org,
        rui.zhang@...el.com, mmayer@...adcom.com,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
        bchihi@...libre.com, wenst@...omium.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] genirq/devres: Add
 devm_request_threaded_irq_emsg()

On 03/07/2023 19:43, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 02:31:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/07/2023 11:04, Yangtao Li wrote:
>>> There are more than 700 calls to the devm_request_threaded_irq method.
>>> Most drivers only request one interrupt resource, and these error
>>> messages are basically the same. If error messages are printed
>>> everywhere, more than 1000 lines of code can be saved by removing the
>>> msg in the driver.
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> +int devm_request_threaded_irq_emsg(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
>>> +				   irq_handler_t handler, irq_handler_t thread_fn,
>>> +				   unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname,
>>> +				   void *dev_id, const char *emsg)
>>> +{
>>> +	int rc;
>>> +
>>> +	rc = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, handler, NULL, irqflags,
>>> +				       devname, dev_id);
>>> +	if (rc && rc != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>>> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to request %sinterrupt %u %s %s: %pe\n",
>>> +			thread_fn ? "threaded " : "", irq, devname ? : dev_name(dev),
>>> +			emsg ? : "", ERR_PTR(rc));
>>
>> It is open-coding dev_err_probe(). Just use dev_err_probe instead.
> 
> dev_err_probe is supposed to be only called in probe functions, while
> devm_request_threaded_irq might be called in other contexts (e.g. when a
> device is opened). That's why I asked to not use dev_err_probe() in v2

True, but then all the callers of this function will forget to set
deferred probe reason.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ