linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Split bus_prot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <59b1b17b-64f8-1f60-7206-4d0a03e4eecb@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2023 12:25:36 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Chun-Jie Chen <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>,
        Fabien Parent <parent.f@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Split bus_prot_mask

Il 27/06/23 15:10, Markus Schneider-Pargmann ha scritto:
> bus_prot_mask is used for all operations, set clear and acknowledge. In
> preparation of m8365 power domain support split this one mask into two,
> one mask for set and clear, another one for acknowledge.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
> ---
>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h | 14 ++++++++------
>   2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> index aa9ab413479e..c801fa763e89 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> @@ -123,18 +123,20 @@ static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd, st
>   	int i, ret;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
> -		u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
> +		u32 val;
> +		u32 set_clr_mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_set_clr_mask;
> +		u32 sta_mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_sta_mask;
>   
> -		if (!mask)
> +		if (!set_clr_mask)
>   			break;
>   
>   		if (bpd[i].flags & BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)
> -			regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
> +			regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, set_clr_mask);
>   		else
> -			regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
> +			regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, set_clr_mask);
>   
>   		ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
> -					       val, (val & mask) == mask,
> +					       val, (val & sta_mask) == sta_mask,
>   					       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>   		if (ret)
>   			return ret;
> @@ -160,21 +162,23 @@ static int _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
>   	int i, ret;
>   
>   	for (i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> -		u32 val, mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_mask;
> +		u32 val;
> +		u32 set_clr_mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_set_clr_mask;
> +		u32 sta_mask = bpd[i].bus_prot_sta_mask;

Only one nitpick: val should be declared after the others....
That's just for readability and nothing else, obviously.

Anyway, after that change:

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>