linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: Non-pmd-mappable, large folios for folio_add_new_anon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <753fe3a7-e077-09d0-8233-fa834c11d280@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2023 12:19:50 +0100
From:   Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To:     "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@...el.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: Non-pmd-mappable, large folios for
 folio_add_new_anon_rmap()

On 04/07/2023 03:13, Yin, Fengwei wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/4/2023 3:05 AM, Yu Zhao wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 7:53 AM Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In preparation for FLEXIBLE_THP support, improve
>>> folio_add_new_anon_rmap() to allow a non-pmd-mappable, large folio to be
>>> passed to it. In this case, all contained pages are accounted using the
>>> "small" pages scheme.
>>
>> Nit: In this case, all *subpages*  are accounted using the *order-0
>> folio* (or base page) scheme.
> Matthew suggested not to use subpage with folio. Using page with folio:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Y9qiS%2FIxZOMx62t6@casper.infradead.org/

OK, I'll change this to "In this case, all contained pages are accounted using
the *order-0 folio* (or base page) scheme."

> 
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>

Thanks!

>>
>>>  mm/rmap.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>>> index 1d8369549424..82ef5ba363d1 100644
>>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>>> @@ -1278,31 +1278,43 @@ void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>   * This means the inc-and-test can be bypassed.
>>>   * The folio does not have to be locked.
>>>   *
>>> - * If the folio is large, it is accounted as a THP.  As the folio
>>> + * If the folio is pmd-mappable, it is accounted as a THP.  As the folio
>>>   * is new, it's assumed to be mapped exclusively by a single process.
>>>   */
>>>  void folio_add_new_anon_rmap(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>                 unsigned long address)
>>>  {
>>> -       int nr;
>>> +       int nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>>> +       int i;
>>> +       struct page *page;
>>>
>>> -       VM_BUG_ON_VMA(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end, vma);
>>> +       VM_BUG_ON_VMA(address < vma->vm_start ||
>>> +                       address + (nr << PAGE_SHIFT) > vma->vm_end, vma);
>>>         __folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
>>>
>>> -       if (likely(!folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))) {
>>> +       if (!folio_test_large(folio)) {
>>>                 /* increment count (starts at -1) */
>>>                 atomic_set(&folio->_mapcount, 0);
>>> -               nr = 1;
>>> +               __page_set_anon_rmap(folio, &folio->page, vma, address, 1);
>>> +       } else if (!folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) {
>>> +               /* increment count (starts at 0) */
>>> +               atomic_set(&folio->_nr_pages_mapped, nr);
>>> +
>>> +               page = &folio->page;
>>> +               for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, page++, address += PAGE_SIZE) {
>>> +                       /* increment count (starts at -1) */
>>> +                       atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, 0);
>>> +                       __page_set_anon_rmap(folio, page, vma, address, 1);
>>> +               }
>>
>> Nit: use folio_page(), e.g.,

Yep, will change for v3.

>>
>>   } else if (!folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) {
>>     int i;
>>
>>     for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
>>       struct page *page = folio_page(folio, i);
>>
>>       /* increment count (starts at -1) */
>>       atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, 0);
>>       __page_set_anon_rmap(folio, page, vma, address + PAGE_SIZE * i, 1);
>>     }
>>     /* increment count (starts at 0) */
>>     atomic_set(&folio->_nr_pages_mapped, nr);
>>   } else {
>>
>>>         } else {
>>>                 /* increment count (starts at -1) */
>>>                 atomic_set(&folio->_entire_mapcount, 0);
>>>                 atomic_set(&folio->_nr_pages_mapped, COMPOUND_MAPPED);
>>> -               nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>>>                 __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_ANON_THPS, nr);
>>> +               __page_set_anon_rmap(folio, &folio->page, vma, address, 1);
>>>         }
>>>
>>>         __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_ANON_MAPPED, nr);
>>> -       __page_set_anon_rmap(folio, &folio->page, vma, address, 1);
>>>  }