| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230704155034.148262-1-lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 17:50:34 +0200
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Hanks Chen <hanks.chen@...iatek.com>,
Cheng-Yuh.Wu@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] irqchip/gic-v3: Workaround for GIC-700 erratum 2941627
GIC700 erratum 2941627 may cause GIC-700 missing SPIs wake
requests when SPIs are deactivated while targeting a
sleeping CPU - ie a CPU for which the redistributor:
GICR_WAKER.ProcessorSleep == 1
This runtime situation can happen if an SPI that has been
activated on a core is retargeted to a different core, it
becomes pending and the target core subsequently enters a
power state quiescing the respective redistributor.
When this situation is hit, the de-activation carried out
on the core that activated the SPI (through either ICC_EOIR1_EL1
or ICC_DIR_EL1 register writes) does not trigger a wake
requests for the sleeping GIC redistributor even if the SPI
is pending.
Work around the erratum by de-activating the SPI using the
redistributor GICD_ICACTIVER register if the runtime
conditions require it (ie the IRQ was retargeted between
activation and de-activation).
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
---
v1 -> v2:
- Updated trigger condition check in
gic_arm64_erratum_2941627_needed() according to review
- Removed !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE workaround enablement check
Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 3 ++
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
index 9e311bc43e05..e77c57a0adf8 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
@@ -141,6 +141,9 @@ stable kernels.
| ARM | MMU-500 | #841119,826419 | N/A |
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
+| ARM | GIC-700 | #2941627 | ARM64_ERRATUM_2941627 |
++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| Broadcom | Brahma-B53 | N/A | ARM64_ERRATUM_845719 |
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| Broadcom | Brahma-B53 | N/A | ARM64_ERRATUM_843419 |
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index a605aa79435a..5dc73c5d2d60 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
static void __iomem *t241_dist_base_alias[T241_CHIPS_MAX] __read_mostly;
static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(gic_nvidia_t241_erratum);
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(gic_arm64_2941627_erratum);
+
static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly;
static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);
@@ -591,10 +593,39 @@ static void gic_irq_nmi_teardown(struct irq_data *d)
gic_irq_set_prio(d, GICD_INT_DEF_PRI);
}
+static bool gic_arm64_erratum_2941627_needed(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ enum gic_intid_range range;
+
+ if (!static_branch_unlikely(&gic_arm64_2941627_erratum))
+ return false;
+
+ range = get_intid_range(d);
+
+ /*
+ * The workaround is needed if the IRQ is an SPI and
+ * the target cpu is different from the one we are
+ * executing on.
+ */
+ return (range == SPI_RANGE || range == ESPI_RANGE) &&
+ !cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(),
+ irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(d));
+}
+
static void gic_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
write_gicreg(gic_irq(d), ICC_EOIR1_EL1);
isb();
+
+ if (gic_arm64_erratum_2941627_needed(d)) {
+ /*
+ * Make sure the GIC stream deactivate packet
+ * issued by ICC_EOIR1_EL1 has completed before
+ * deactivating through GICD_IACTIVER.
+ */
+ dsb(sy);
+ gic_poke_irq(d, GICD_ICACTIVER);
+ }
}
static void gic_eoimode1_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -605,7 +636,11 @@ static void gic_eoimode1_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
*/
if (gic_irq(d) >= 8192 || irqd_is_forwarded_to_vcpu(d))
return;
- gic_write_dir(gic_irq(d));
+
+ if (!gic_arm64_erratum_2941627_needed(d))
+ gic_write_dir(gic_irq(d));
+ else
+ gic_poke_irq(d, GICD_ICACTIVER);
}
static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
@@ -1796,6 +1831,12 @@ static bool gic_enable_quirk_nvidia_t241(void *data)
return true;
}
+static bool gic_enable_quirk_arm64_2941627(void *data)
+{
+ static_branch_enable(&gic_arm64_2941627_erratum);
+ return true;
+}
+
static const struct gic_quirk gic_quirks[] = {
{
.desc = "GICv3: Qualcomm MSM8996 broken firmware",
@@ -1838,6 +1879,25 @@ static const struct gic_quirk gic_quirks[] = {
.mask = 0xffffffff,
.init = gic_enable_quirk_nvidia_t241,
},
+ {
+ /*
+ * GIC-700: 2941627 workaround - IP variant [0,1]
+ *
+ */
+ .desc = "GICv3: ARM64 erratum 2941627",
+ .iidr = 0x0400043b,
+ .mask = 0xff0e0fff,
+ .init = gic_enable_quirk_arm64_2941627,
+ },
+ {
+ /*
+ * GIC-700: 2941627 workaround - IP variant [2]
+ */
+ .desc = "GICv3: ARM64 erratum 2941627",
+ .iidr = 0x0402043b,
+ .mask = 0xff0f0fff,
+ .init = gic_enable_quirk_arm64_2941627,
+ },
{
}
};
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists