[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26c7e593-7635-e96c-c21f-5fd2e5285281@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 23:11:51 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@...cinc.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/msm/dpu: Remove redundant prefix/suffix in
name of sub-blocks
On 05/07/2023 22:30, Ryan McCann wrote:
> For a device core dump, the registers of sub-blocks are printed under a
> title formatted as <mainBlkName_sblkName>. For example, the csc sub-block
> for an SSPP main block "sspp_0" would be printed "sspp_0_sspp_csc0". The
> title is clearly redundant due to the duplicate "sspp" and "0" that exist
> in both the mainBlkName and sblkName. To eliminate this redundancy, remove
> the secondary "sspp" and "0" that exist in the sub-block name by
> elimanting the "sspp_" prefix and the concatenation of "num" that results
> in the redundant "0" suffix. Remove num parameter altogether from relevant
> macros as a consequence of it no longer being used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 50 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists