linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] spi: Add support for Renesas CSI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUzcc0HSyOwbN4mJPRfEKcLXBU3Op=T1CGR=pFbN619Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:36:54 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     andy.shevchenko@...il.com
Cc:     Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] spi: Add support for Renesas CSI

Hi Andy,

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 12:24 PM <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 12:19:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven kirjoitti:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 1:34 PM Fabrizio Castro
> > <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com> wrote:
> > > +       if (csi->txbuf)
> > > +               /*
> > > +                * Leaving a little bit of headroom in the FIFOs makes it very
> > > +                * hard to raise an overflow error (which is only possible
> > > +                * when IP transmits and receives at the same time).
> > > +                */
> > > +               to_transfer = min_t(int, CSI_FIFO_HALF_SIZE, bytes_remaining);
> > > +       else
> > > +               to_transfer = min_t(int, CSI_FIFO_SIZE_BYTES, bytes_remaining);
> >
> > Why min_t(int, ...)? Both values are int.
>
> min_t() should be used with a great care.
>
> > It would be better to make both unsigned, though.
>
> I believe you are assuming 3 (three) values and not 2 (two) under "both"
> (one variable and two definitions).

:-)

I meant "both numerical parametric values of each minimum operation".

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds