linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] BPF kselftest cross-build/RISC-V fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ee053a4-500c-2722-d822-d137648e55e5@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jul 2023 14:38:49 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] BPF kselftest cross-build/RISC-V fixes

On 7/5/23 1:39 PM, Björn Töpel wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
> 
> This series has two minor fixes, found when cross-compiling for the
> RISC-V architecture.
> 
> Some RISC-V systems do not define HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
> which made some of tests bail out. Fix the failing tests by adding
> F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
> 
> ...and some RISC-V systems *do* define
> HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. In this case the autoconf.h was not
> correctly picked up by the build system.

Looks good, applied thanks! Any plans on working towards integrating riscv
into upstream BPF CI? Would love to see that happening. :)

Thanks,
Daniel