[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230705141626.461-1-11162513@vivo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 22:16:26 +0800
From: Zehao Zhang <11162513@...o.com>
To: jstultz@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, sboyd@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zehao Zhang <zhangzehao@...o.com>
Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: Convert to use time_after macro
From: Zehao Zhang <zhangzehao@...o.com>
Use time after macro instead of open it for readability.
Signed-off-by: Zehao Zhang <zhangzehao@...o.com>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 266d02809dbb..b57bcb9b4ead 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, u64 offset)
}
if (tk->underflow_seen) {
- if (jiffies - tk->last_warning > WARNING_FREQ) {
+ if (time_after(jiffies, tk->last_warning + WARNING_FREQ)) {
printk_deferred("WARNING: Underflow in clocksource '%s' observed, time update ignored.\n", name);
printk_deferred(" Please report this, consider using a different clocksource, if possible.\n");
printk_deferred(" Your kernel is probably still fine.\n");
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, u64 offset)
}
if (tk->overflow_seen) {
- if (jiffies - tk->last_warning > WARNING_FREQ) {
+ if (time_after(jiffies, tk->last_warning + WARNING_FREQ)) {
printk_deferred("WARNING: Overflow in clocksource '%s' observed, time update capped.\n", name);
printk_deferred(" Please report this, consider using a different clocksource, if possible.\n");
printk_deferred(" Your kernel is probably still fine.\n");
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists