linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: bnx2fc: Remove a duplicate assignment in two functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <92beb7aa971b2fb600e4d47158b66bfe660d3c89.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 05 Jul 2023 10:32:25 -0400
From:   Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>
To:     Minjie Du <duminjie@...o.com>, Markus.Elfring@....de,
        Saurav Kashyap <skashyap@...vell.com>,
        Javed Hasan <jhasan@...vell.com>,
        "supporter:BROADCOM BNX2FC 10 GIGABIT FCOE DRIVER" 
        <GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "open list:BROADCOM BNX2FC 10 GIGABIT FCOE DRIVER" 
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: bnx2fc: Remove a duplicate assignment in two
 functions

On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 19:52 +0800, Minjie Du wrote:
> Delete a duplicate statement from these function implementations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minjie Du <duminjie@...o.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_hwi.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_hwi.c
> b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_hwi.c
> index 776544385..0474fe88a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_hwi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_hwi.c
> @@ -1521,8 +1521,6 @@ void bnx2fc_init_seq_cleanup_task(struct
> bnx2fc_cmd *seq_clnp_req,
>                                 FCOE_TCE_TX_WR_RX_RD_CONST_CLASS_TYPE
> _SHIFT;
>         task->rxwr_txrd.const_ctx.init_flags = context_id <<
>                                 FCOE_TCE_RX_WR_TX_RD_CONST_CID_SHIFT;
> -       task->rxwr_txrd.const_ctx.init_flags = context_id <<
> -                               FCOE_TCE_RX_WR_TX_RD_CONST_CID_SHIFT;
>  
>         task->txwr_rxrd.union_ctx.cleanup.ctx.cleaned_task_id =
> orig_xid;
>  
> @@ -1763,7 +1761,6 @@ void bnx2fc_init_task(struct bnx2fc_cmd
> *io_req,
>                                 FCOE_TASK_DEV_TYPE_TAPE <<
>                                 FCOE_TCE_TX_WR_RX_RD_CONST_DEV_TYPE_S
> HIFT;
>                 io_req->rec_retry = 0;
> -               io_req->rec_retry = 0;
>         } else
>                 task->txwr_rxrd.const_ctx.init_flags |=
>                                 FCOE_TASK_DEV_TYPE_DISK <<

Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>