linux-kernel - [for-linus][PATCH 3/3] tracing/boot: Test strscpy() against less than zero for error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230705144632.294731621@goodmis.org>
Date:   Wed, 05 Jul 2023 10:40:34 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [for-linus][PATCH 3/3] tracing/boot: Test strscpy() against less than zero for error

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>

Instead of checking for -E2BIG, it is better to just check for less than
zero of strscpy() for error. Testing for -E2BIG is not very robust, and
the calling code does not really care about the error code, just that
there was an error.

One of the updates to convert strlcpy() to strscpy() had a v2 version
that changed the test from testing against -E2BIG to less than zero, but I
took the v1 version that still tested for -E2BIG.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230615180420.400769-1-azeemshaikh38@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230704100807.707d1605@rorschach.local.home

Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_boot.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_boot.c b/kernel/trace/trace_boot.c
index 5fe525f1b8cc..7ccc7a8e155b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_boot.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_boot.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ trace_boot_set_instance_options(struct trace_array *tr, struct xbc_node *node)
 
 	/* Common ftrace options */
 	xbc_node_for_each_array_value(node, "options", anode, p) {
-		if (strscpy(buf, p, ARRAY_SIZE(buf)) == -E2BIG) {
+		if (strscpy(buf, p, ARRAY_SIZE(buf)) < 0) {
 			pr_err("String is too long: %s\n", p);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ trace_boot_enable_events(struct trace_array *tr, struct xbc_node *node)
 	const char *p;
 
 	xbc_node_for_each_array_value(node, "events", anode, p) {
-		if (strscpy(buf, p, ARRAY_SIZE(buf)) == -E2BIG) {
+		if (strscpy(buf, p, ARRAY_SIZE(buf)) < 0) {
 			pr_err("String is too long: %s\n", p);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ trace_boot_init_one_event(struct trace_array *tr, struct xbc_node *gnode,
 
 	p = xbc_node_find_value(enode, "filter", NULL);
 	if (p && *p != '\0') {
-		if (strscpy(buf, p, ARRAY_SIZE(buf)) == -E2BIG)
+		if (strscpy(buf, p, ARRAY_SIZE(buf)) < 0)
 			pr_err("filter string is too long: %s\n", p);
 		else if (apply_event_filter(file, buf) < 0)
 			pr_err("Failed to apply filter: %s\n", buf);
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ trace_boot_init_one_event(struct trace_array *tr, struct xbc_node *gnode,
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIST_TRIGGERS)) {
 		xbc_node_for_each_array_value(enode, "actions", anode, p) {
-			if (strscpy(buf, p, ARRAY_SIZE(buf)) == -E2BIG)
+			if (strscpy(buf, p, ARRAY_SIZE(buf)) < 0)
 				pr_err("action string is too long: %s\n", p);
 			else if (trigger_process_regex(file, buf) < 0)
 				pr_err("Failed to apply an action: %s\n", p);
-- 
2.39.2