[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230705110534.1b79bf79@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 11:05:34 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@...il.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/trace: Fix cleanup logic of
enable_trace_eprobe
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 11:03:02 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 06:47:12 +0300
> Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Ok, I'll send v3 with the counter, although I think it is a bit
> > overengineering - that optimization is in code that is unlikely to be
> > executed.
>
> It's not really over-engineering. We have this type of logic all over the
> kernel. When rolling back something, you really only want to rollback what
> you did, and not more. It prevents future bugs and makes things a bit more
> robust.
>
> I'll go pick up v3 now.
>
Masami, I see you delegated this patch to yourself. If you have something
you are working on to send to Linus soon, I'll let you take it.
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists