[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5D_p3hf+HVHNAijEevJRpzwmyGPcoHjiapsOx_ddsoksg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 12:22:55 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: Nate Drude <Nate.D@...iscite.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Pierluigi Passaro <pierluigi.p@...iscite.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mn-var-som-symphony: fix USB OTG
Hi Hugo,
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 11:48 AM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
> Fabio: do we need to support both configurations in the Linux kernel
> tree, and if yes how do you propose we do it?
I would suggest supporting the new revision only.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists