[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5ed729a-55f8-f148-03b8-7952f94572dd@foss.st.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 17:57:51 +0200
From: Valentin CARON <valentin.caron@...s.st.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...s.st.com>,
Christophe Guibout <christophe.guibout@...s.st.com>,
Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
<linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] rtc: stm32: improve rtc precision
Hi Alexandre,
Sorry for the delay
On 6/26/23 01:14, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 15/06/2023 11:27:49+0200, Valentin Caron wrote:
>> From: Christophe Guibout <christophe.guibout@...s.st.com>
>>
>> The rtc is used to update the stgen counter on wake up from
>> low power modes, so it needs to be as much accurate as possible.
>>
>> The maximization of asynchronous divider leads to a 4ms rtc
>> precision clock.
>> By decreasing pred_a to 0, it will have pred_s=32767 (when
>> need_accuracy is true), so stgen clock becomes more accurate
>> with 30us precision.
>> Nevertheless this will leads to an increase of power consumption.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Guibout <christophe.guibout@...s.st.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@...s.st.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
>> index bd7a59a07537..cad88668bcfb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
>> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ struct stm32_rtc_data {
>> void (*clear_events)(struct stm32_rtc *rtc, unsigned int flags);
>> bool has_pclk;
>> bool need_dbp;
>> + bool need_accuracy;
>> };
>>
>> struct stm32_rtc {
>> @@ -545,6 +546,7 @@ static void stm32_rtc_clear_events(struct stm32_rtc *rtc,
>> static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32_rtc_data = {
>> .has_pclk = false,
>> .need_dbp = true,
>> + .need_accuracy = false,
>> .regs = {
>> .tr = 0x00,
>> .dr = 0x04,
>> @@ -566,6 +568,7 @@ static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32_rtc_data = {
>> static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32h7_rtc_data = {
>> .has_pclk = true,
>> .need_dbp = true,
>> + .need_accuracy = false,
>> .regs = {
>> .tr = 0x00,
>> .dr = 0x04,
>> @@ -596,6 +599,7 @@ static void stm32mp1_rtc_clear_events(struct stm32_rtc *rtc,
>> static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32mp1_data = {
>> .has_pclk = true,
>> .need_dbp = false,
>> + .need_accuracy = true,
>> .regs = {
>> .tr = 0x00,
>> .dr = 0x04,
>> @@ -636,11 +640,25 @@ static int stm32_rtc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> pred_a_max = STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_A >> STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_A_SHIFT;
>> pred_s_max = STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_S >> STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_S_SHIFT;
>>
>> - for (pred_a = pred_a_max; pred_a + 1 > 0; pred_a--) {
>> - pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
>> + if (rate > (pred_a_max + 1) * (pred_s_max + 1)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "rtc_ck rate is too high: %dHz\n", rate);
> What is the expect user action after seeing this message?
User could change of source clock by a smaller one (in terms of
frequency) or adjust the clock divider in amount of RTC.
e.g. on STM32MP1, RTC source clock could be:
- LSE clock
- LSI clock
- HSE clock * an adjustable divider.
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (rtc->data->need_accuracy) {
>> + for (pred_a = 0; pred_a <= pred_a_max; pred_a++) {
>> + pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
>>
>> - if (((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate)
>> - break;
>> + if (pred_s <= pred_s_max && ((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + for (pred_a = pred_a_max; pred_a + 1 > 0; pred_a--) {
>> + pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
>> +
>> + if (((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
Regards,
Valentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists