[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230705174357.353616-4-valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 19:43:53 +0200
From: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@...s.st.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
CC: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...s.st.com>,
Christophe Guibout <christophe.guibout@...s.st.com>,
Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
<linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@...s.st.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] rtc: stm32: improve rtc precision
From: Christophe Guibout <christophe.guibout@...s.st.com>
The rtc is used to update the stgen counter on wake up from
low power modes, so it needs to be as much accurate as possible.
The maximization of asynchronous divider leads to a 4ms rtc
precision clock.
By decreasing pred_a to 0, it will have pred_s=32767 (when
need_accuracy is true), so stgen clock becomes more accurate
with 30us precision.
Nevertheless this will leads to an increase of power consumption.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Guibout <christophe.guibout@...s.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@...s.st.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
index bd7a59a07537..cad88668bcfb 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ struct stm32_rtc_data {
void (*clear_events)(struct stm32_rtc *rtc, unsigned int flags);
bool has_pclk;
bool need_dbp;
+ bool need_accuracy;
};
struct stm32_rtc {
@@ -545,6 +546,7 @@ static void stm32_rtc_clear_events(struct stm32_rtc *rtc,
static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32_rtc_data = {
.has_pclk = false,
.need_dbp = true,
+ .need_accuracy = false,
.regs = {
.tr = 0x00,
.dr = 0x04,
@@ -566,6 +568,7 @@ static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32_rtc_data = {
static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32h7_rtc_data = {
.has_pclk = true,
.need_dbp = true,
+ .need_accuracy = false,
.regs = {
.tr = 0x00,
.dr = 0x04,
@@ -596,6 +599,7 @@ static void stm32mp1_rtc_clear_events(struct stm32_rtc *rtc,
static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32mp1_data = {
.has_pclk = true,
.need_dbp = false,
+ .need_accuracy = true,
.regs = {
.tr = 0x00,
.dr = 0x04,
@@ -636,11 +640,25 @@ static int stm32_rtc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
pred_a_max = STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_A >> STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_A_SHIFT;
pred_s_max = STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_S >> STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_S_SHIFT;
- for (pred_a = pred_a_max; pred_a + 1 > 0; pred_a--) {
- pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
+ if (rate > (pred_a_max + 1) * (pred_s_max + 1)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "rtc_ck rate is too high: %dHz\n", rate);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (rtc->data->need_accuracy) {
+ for (pred_a = 0; pred_a <= pred_a_max; pred_a++) {
+ pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
- if (((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate)
- break;
+ if (pred_s <= pred_s_max && ((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate)
+ break;
+ }
+ } else {
+ for (pred_a = pred_a_max; pred_a + 1 > 0; pred_a--) {
+ pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
+
+ if (((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate)
+ break;
+ }
}
/*
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists