| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2887841.e9J7NaK4W3@basile.remlab.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 23:04:24 +0300
From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net>
To: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] RISC-V: Framework for vendor extensions
Le torstaina 6. heinäkuuta 2023, 22.44.07 EEST Charlie Jenkins a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 07:29:37PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> > Le torstaina 6. heinäkuuta 2023, 6.30.17 EEST Charlie Jenkins a écrit :
> > > Create Kconfig files, Makefiles, and functions to enable vendors to
> > > provide information via the riscv_hwprobe syscall about which vendor
> > > extensions are available.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > arch/riscv/Kbuild | 1 +
> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig.vendor | 3 +++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 1 +
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c | 40
> > >
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > arch/riscv/vendor_extensions/Makefile |
> > >
> > > 3 +++
> > > 6 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kbuild b/arch/riscv/Kbuild
> > > index afa83e307a2e..bea38010d9db 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kbuild
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kbuild
> > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > >
> > > obj-y += kernel/ mm/ net/
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB) += boot/dts/
> > > obj-y += errata/
> > >
> > > +obj-y += vendor_extensions/
> > >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += kvm/
> > >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_KEXEC_PURGATORY) += purgatory/
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > index c1505c7729ec..19404ede0ee3 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ config AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH
> > >
> > > source "arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs"
> > > source "arch/riscv/Kconfig.errata"
> > >
> > > +source "arch/riscv/Kconfig.vendor"
> > >
> > > menu "Platform type"
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.vendor b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.vendor
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..213ac3e6fed5
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.vendor
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> > > +menu "Vendor extensions selection"
> > > +
> > > +endmenu # "Vendor extensions selection"
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
> > > b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h index 78936f4ff513..fadb38b83243
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
> > > @@ -9,5 +9,6 @@
> > >
> > > #include <uapi/asm/hwprobe.h>
> > >
> > > #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 5
> > >
> > > +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VENDOR_EXTENSION_SPACE (UL(1)<<63)
> >
> > Isn't this UB on 32-bit RISC-V ?
>
> Hmm, yeah it would be, but the hwprobe syscall is based on a 64 bit key
> using the __s64 type. There could be an alternative vendor space at the
> top of 32-bits for those machines.
Key values inside the struct are 64-bit even on RV32, but your key definition
here is 32-bit. That can't work.
Plus this needs to be defined under uapi/ as the rest of the hwprobe constants.
And then, even on RV64, 1UL << 63 is not a valid signed constant. Kernel code
might tolerate it, but that will most likely cause warnings or errors in the
potentially stricter compilation environments of user-space code.
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
> > > b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
> > > index 26ef5526bfb4..2351a5f7b8b1 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c
> > > @@ -188,9 +188,35 @@ static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask
> > > *cpus) return perf;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int hwprobe_vendor(__u64 mvendorid, struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
> > > + const struct cpumask *cpus)
> > > +{
> > > + switch (mvendorid) {
> > > + default:
> > > + return -1;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >
> > > static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
> > >
> > > const struct cpumask *cpus)
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > + int err;
> > > +
> > > + if (((unsigned long) pair->key) >=
> >
> > RISCV_HWPROBE_VENDOR_EXTENSION_SPACE) {
> >
> > > + struct riscv_hwprobe mvendorid = {
> > > + .key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MVENDORID,
> > > + .value = 0
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + hwprobe_arch_id(&mvendorid, cpus);
> > > + if (mvendorid.value != -1ULL)
> > > + err = hwprobe_vendor(mvendorid.value, pair,
> >
> > cpus);
> >
> > > + else
> > > + err = -1;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > >
> > > switch (pair->key) {
> > > case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MVENDORID:
> > >
> > > case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MARCHID:
> > > @@ -217,13 +243,21 @@ static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe
> > > *pair,
> > >
> > > /*
> > >
> > > * For forward compatibility, unknown keys don't fail the whole
> > >
> > > - * call, but get their element key set to -1 and value set to 0
> > > - * indicating they're unrecognized.
> > > + * call, instead an error is raised to indicate the element key
> > > + * is unrecognized.
> > >
> > > */
> > >
> > > default:
> > > + err = -1;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Setting the element key to -1 and value to 0 indicates that
> > > + * hwprobe was unable to find the requested key.
> > > + */
> > > + if (err != 0) {
> > >
> > > pair->key = -1;
> > > pair->value = 0;
> > >
> > > - break;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/vendor_extensions/Makefile
> > > b/arch/riscv/vendor_extensions/Makefile new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..e815895e9372
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/vendor_extensions/Makefile
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> > > +ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
> > > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-pie
> > > +endif
--
雷米‧德尼-库尔蒙
http://www.remlab.net/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists