linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/msm/dpu: Update dev core dump to dump registers of sub-blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230622-devcoredump_patch-v4-6-e304ddbe9648@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2023 13:48:37 -0700
From:   Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@...cinc.com>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
CC:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>, Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@...cinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/msm/dpu: Update dev core dump to dump registers
 of sub-blocks

Currently, the device core dump mechanism does not dump registers of
sub-blocks within the DSPP, SSPP, DSC, and PINGPONG blocks. Edit
dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot function to account for sub-blocks.

Signed-off-by: Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@...cinc.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
index 70dbb1204e6c..afc45d597d65 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
@@ -903,25 +903,58 @@ static void dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state, struct msm_k
 					    cat->ctl[i].base, cat->ctl[i].name);
 
 	/* dump DSPP sub-blocks HW regs info */
-	for (i = 0; i < cat->dspp_count; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < cat->dspp_count; i++) {
 		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->dspp[i].len, dpu_kms->mmio +
 					    cat->dspp[i].base, cat->dspp[i].name);
 
+		if (cat->dspp[i].sblk && cat->dspp[i].sblk->pcc.len > 0)
+			msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->dspp[i].sblk->pcc.len,
+						    dpu_kms->mmio + cat->dspp[i].base +
+						    cat->dspp[i].sblk->pcc.base, "%s_%s",
+						    cat->dspp[i].name,
+						    cat->dspp[i].sblk->pcc.name);
+	}
+
 	/* dump INTF sub-blocks HW regs info */
 	for (i = 0; i < cat->intf_count; i++)
 		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->intf[i].len, dpu_kms->mmio +
 					    cat->intf[i].base, cat->intf[i].name);
 
 	/* dump PP sub-blocks HW regs info */
-	for (i = 0; i < cat->pingpong_count; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < cat->pingpong_count; i++) {
 		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->pingpong[i].len, dpu_kms->mmio +
 					    cat->pingpong[i].base, cat->pingpong[i].name);
 
+		/* TE2 block has length of 0, so will not print it */
+
+		if (cat->pingpong[i].sblk && cat->pingpong[i].sblk->dither.len > 0)
+			msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->pingpong[i].sblk->dither.len,
+						    dpu_kms->mmio + cat->pingpong[i].base +
+						    cat->pingpong[i].sblk->dither.base, "%s_%s",
+						    cat->pingpong[i].name,
+						    cat->pingpong[i].sblk->dither.name);
+	}
+
 	/* dump SSPP sub-blocks HW regs info */
-	for (i = 0; i < cat->sspp_count; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < cat->sspp_count; i++) {
 		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->sspp[i].len, dpu_kms->mmio +
 					    cat->sspp[i].base, cat->sspp[i].name);
 
+		if (cat->sspp[i].sblk && cat->sspp[i].sblk->scaler_blk.len > 0)
+			msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->sspp[i].sblk->scaler_blk.len,
+						    dpu_kms->mmio + cat->sspp[i].base +
+						    cat->sspp[i].sblk->scaler_blk.base, "%s_%s",
+						    cat->sspp[i].name,
+						    cat->sspp[i].sblk->scaler_blk.name);
+
+		if (cat->sspp[i].sblk && cat->sspp[i].sblk->csc_blk.len > 0)
+			msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->sspp[i].sblk->csc_blk.len,
+						    dpu_kms->mmio + cat->sspp[i].base +
+						    cat->sspp[i].sblk->csc_blk.base, "%s_%s",
+						    cat->sspp[i].name,
+						    cat->sspp[i].sblk->csc_blk.name);
+	}
+
 	/* dump LM sub-blocks HW regs info */
 	for (i = 0; i < cat->mixer_count; i++)
 		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->mixer[i].len, dpu_kms->mmio +
@@ -943,9 +976,30 @@ static void dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state, struct msm_k
 	}
 
 	/* dump DSC sub-blocks HW regs info */
-	for (i = 0; i < cat->dsc_count; i++)
-		msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->dsc[i].len, dpu_kms->mmio +
-					    cat->dsc[i].base, cat->dsc[i].name);
+	for (i = 0; i < cat->dsc_count; i++) {
+		if (cat->dsc[i].features & BIT(DPU_DSC_HW_REV_1_2)) {
+			struct dpu_dsc_blk enc = cat->dsc[i].sblk->enc;
+			struct dpu_dsc_blk ctl = cat->dsc[i].sblk->ctl;
+
+			/* For now, pass in a length of 0 because the DSC_BLK register space
+			 * overlaps with the sblks' register space.
+			 *
+			 * TODO: Pass in a length of 0 to DSC_BLK_1_2 in the HW catalog where
+			 * applicable.
+			 */
+			msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, 0, dpu_kms->mmio +
+						    cat->dsc[i].base, cat->dsc[i].name);
+			msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, enc.len, dpu_kms->mmio +
+						    cat->dsc[i].base + enc.base, "%s_%s",
+						    cat->dsc[i].name, enc.name);
+			msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, ctl.len, dpu_kms->mmio +
+						    cat->dsc[i].base + ctl.base, "%s_%s",
+						    cat->dsc[i].name, ctl.name);
+		} else {
+			msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->dsc[i].len, dpu_kms->mmio +
+						    cat->dsc[i].base, cat->dsc[i].name);
+		}
+	}
 
 	pm_runtime_put_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
 }

-- 
2.25.1