| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Wju3WS45=EpXMUg7FjYDh3-=mvm_jS7TF1tsaAzbb4Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 14:11:35 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Ruihai Zhou <zhouruihai@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Cong Yang <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>,
Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/panel: boe-tv101wum-nl6: Drop macros and open
code sequences
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:22 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> The boe-tv101wum-nl6 is reinventing the mechanism to send command
> sequences that we usually nix during review, but I missed this one
> so fixing it up myself.
Sorry for this. :( I know I've reviewed/applied several of the patches
that made this worse, but I believe that the whole array/sequence
scheme predated my involvement in the driver. I've never been a huge
fan of these black box sequences and try to make it a point to grumble
about them each time through the review, though again their use
predated my involvement...
> Also use the explicit function calls to mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode()
> and mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on() instead of reimplementing them
> with homegrown sequences.
Yeah, this is nice, thanks!
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v2->v3:
> - Convert the two newly added Starry displays as well.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-boe-tv101wum-nl6.c | 3351 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 1654 insertions(+), 1697 deletions(-)
I'm at least moderately curious if you did size comparisons in the
resulting binary before and after. Given that mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq()
is currently implemented as a macro this seems like it has the
potential of massively exploding the size of the compiled object size.
Even if it wasn't a macro, I'd wonder if the compiler is really smart
enough to generate code that's as good for these long sequences. The
call sequences for several hundred function calls could be enough
overhead to justify adding a function to the core that handles an
array of sequences. Would that be a good compromise? Add to the core
handling of a sequence of sequences but don't add the extra special
case for delays (each time you need a delay you need to start a new
sequence of sequences).
Aside from the potential binary size bloat, I guess this also has the
downside of not considering it a true error if one of these init steps
fails for some reason. The new code will just spit out a ratelimited
error and continue trying to init whereas the old code would have
stopped immediately. The new way is probably OK, but the difference in
behavior should be noted in the commit message in case this is causing
problems for anyone.
> +static int inx_hj110iz_init(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> +{
> + int ret;
>
> -static const struct panel_init_cmd auo_kd101n80_45na_init_cmd[] = {
> - _INIT_DELAY_CMD(24),
> - _INIT_DCS_CMD(0x11),
> - _INIT_DELAY_CMD(120),
> - _INIT_DCS_CMD(0x29),
> - _INIT_DELAY_CMD(120),
> - {},
> -};
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xFF, 0x20);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xFB, 0x01);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0x05, 0xD1);
The sequence of init commands for inx_hj110iz_init() is quite
different before and after your patch. The first such difference is
right here. The old code used to have "0x06, 0xC0" right after the
"0x05, 0xD1"
Is this on purpose? If so, can you please move that change to a
separate patch and have this patch be _just_ a no-op.
> +static int boe_init(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> +{
> + msleep(24);
Where did the msleep(24) come from? It wasn't there before your patch,
right? Please make this patch a no-op and add the 24ms sleep in a
separate patch if it's needed.
> +static int starry_qfh032011_53g_init(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> {
> - struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = boe->dsi;
> - struct drm_panel *panel = &boe->base;
> - int i, err = 0;
> -
> - if (boe->desc->init_cmds) {
> - const struct panel_init_cmd *init_cmds = boe->desc->init_cmds;
> -
> - for (i = 0; init_cmds[i].len != 0; i++) {
> - const struct panel_init_cmd *cmd = &init_cmds[i];
> -
> - switch (cmd->type) {
> - case DELAY_CMD:
> - msleep(cmd->data[0]);
> - err = 0;
> - break;
> -
> - case INIT_DCS_CMD:
> - err = mipi_dsi_dcs_write(dsi, cmd->data[0],
> - cmd->len <= 1 ? NULL :
> - &cmd->data[1],
> - cmd->len - 1);
> - break;
> -
> - default:
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - if (err < 0) {
> - dev_err(panel->dev,
> - "failed to write command %u\n", i);
> - return err;
> - }
> - }
> - }
> + int ret;
> +
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xB0, 0x01);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC3, 0x4F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC4, 0x40);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC5, 0x40);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC6, 0x40);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC7, 0x40);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC8, 0x4D);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC9, 0x52);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCA, 0x51);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCD, 0x5D);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCE, 0x5B);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCF, 0x4B);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD0, 0x49);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD1, 0x47);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD2, 0x45);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD3, 0x41);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD7, 0x50);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD8, 0x40);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD9, 0x40);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDA, 0x40);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDB, 0x40);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDC, 0x4E);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDD, 0x52);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDE, 0x51);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE1, 0x5E);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE2, 0x5C);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE3, 0x4C);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE4, 0x4A);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE5, 0x48);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE6, 0x46);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE7, 0x42);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xB0, 0x03);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBE, 0x03);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCC, 0x44);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC8, 0x07);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC9, 0x05);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCA, 0x42);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCD, 0x3E);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCF, 0x60);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD2, 0x04);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD3, 0x04);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD4, 0x01);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD5, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD6, 0x03);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD7, 0x04);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD9, 0x01);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDB, 0x01);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE4, 0xF0);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE5, 0x0A);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xB0, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCC, 0x08);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC2, 0x08);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC4, 0x10);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xB0, 0x02);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC0, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC1, 0x0A);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC2, 0x20);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC3, 0x24);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC4, 0x23);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC5, 0x29);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC6, 0x23);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC7, 0x1C);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC8, 0x19);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC9, 0x17);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCA, 0x17);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCB, 0x18);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCC, 0x1A);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCD, 0x1E);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCE, 0x20);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCF, 0x23);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD0, 0x07);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD1, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD2, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD3, 0x0A);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD4, 0x13);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD5, 0x1C);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD6, 0x1A);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD7, 0x13);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD8, 0x17);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD9, 0x1C);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDA, 0x19);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDB, 0x17);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDC, 0x17);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDD, 0x18);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDE, 0x1A);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xDF, 0x1E);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE0, 0x20);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE1, 0x23);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE2, 0x07);
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + msleep(120);
> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(dsi);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + msleep(80);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> +
> +static int starry_himax83102_j02_init(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
nit: don't need two blank lines between functions. ...and if you do,
for some reason, you should be consistent and have two blank lines
between _all_ of them, not just some.
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xB9, 0x83, 0x10, 0x21, 0x55, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xB1, 0x2C, 0xB5, 0xB5, 0x31, 0xF1, 0x31, 0xD7, 0x2F, 0x36, 0x36,
> + 0x36, 0x36, 0x1A, 0x8B, 0x11, 0x65, 0x00, 0x88, 0xFA, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x8F,
> + 0xFF, 0x08, 0x74, 0x33);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xB2, 0x00, 0x47, 0xB0, 0x80, 0x00, 0x12, 0x72, 0x3C, 0xA3, 0x03,
> + 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x88, 0xF5);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xB4, 0x76, 0x76, 0x76, 0x76, 0x76, 0x76, 0x63, 0x5C, 0x63, 0x5C,
> + 0x01, 0x9E);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0xCD);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBA, 0x84);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0x3F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBC, 0x1B, 0x04);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBE, 0x20);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBF, 0xFC, 0xC4);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC0, 0x36, 0x36, 0x22, 0x11, 0x22, 0xA0, 0x61, 0x08, 0xF5, 0x03);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0xCC);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC7, 0x80);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0x3F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0xC6);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC8, 0x97);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0x3F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xC9, 0x00, 0x1E, 0x13, 0x88, 0x01);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCB, 0x08, 0x13, 0x07, 0x00, 0x0F, 0x33);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCC, 0x02);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0xC4);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD0, 0x03);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0x3F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD1, 0x37, 0x06, 0x00, 0x02, 0x04, 0x0C, 0xFF);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD2, 0x1F, 0x11, 0x1F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD3, 0x06, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x08,
> + 0x37, 0x47, 0x34, 0x3B, 0x12, 0x12, 0x03, 0x03, 0x32, 0x10, 0x10,
> + 0x00, 0x10, 0x32, 0x10, 0x08, 0x00, 0x08, 0x32, 0x17, 0x94, 0x07,
> + 0x94, 0x00, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD5, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18,
> + 0x18, 0x19, 0x19, 0x40, 0x40, 0x1A, 0x1A, 0x1B, 0x1B, 0x00, 0x01,
> + 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x20, 0x21, 0x28, 0x29, 0x18,
> + 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18,
> + 0x18, 0x18);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD6, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18,
> + 0x18, 0x40, 0x40, 0x19, 0x19, 0x1A, 0x1A, 0x1B, 0x1B, 0x07, 0x06,
> + 0x05, 0x04, 0x03, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x29, 0x28, 0x21, 0x20, 0x18,
> + 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18, 0x18,
> + 0x18, 0x18);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD8, 0xAA, 0xBA, 0xEA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xA0, 0xAA, 0xBA, 0xEA,
> + 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xA0, 0xAA, 0xBA, 0xEA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xA0, 0xAA, 0xBA,
> + 0xEA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xA0, 0xAA, 0xBA, 0xEA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xA0, 0xAA,
> + 0xBA, 0xEA, 0xAA, 0xAA, 0xA0);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE0, 0x00, 0x09, 0x14, 0x1E, 0x26, 0x48, 0x61, 0x67, 0x6C,
> + 0x67, 0x7D, 0x7F, 0x80, 0x8B, 0x87, 0x8F, 0x98, 0xAB, 0xAB, 0x55,
> + 0x5C, 0x68, 0x73, 0x00, 0x09, 0x14, 0x1E, 0x26, 0x48, 0x61, 0x67,
> + 0x6C, 0x67, 0x7D, 0x7F, 0x80, 0x8B, 0x87, 0x8F, 0x98, 0xAB, 0xAB,
> + 0x55, 0x5C, 0x68, 0x73);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE7, 0x0E, 0x10, 0x10, 0x21, 0x2B, 0x9A, 0x02, 0x54, 0x9A,
> + 0x14, 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x12, 0x05, 0x02, 0x02, 0x10);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBD, 0x01);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xB1, 0x01, 0xBF, 0x11);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xCB, 0x86);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD2, 0x3C, 0xFA);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0xC5);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD3, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0C, 0x01);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0x3F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE7, 0x02, 0x00, 0x28, 0x01, 0x7E, 0x0F, 0x7E, 0x10, 0xA0,
> + 0x00, 0x00, 0x20, 0x40, 0x50, 0x40);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBD, 0x02);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD8, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xBF, 0xFE, 0xAA, 0xA0, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xBF,
> + 0xFE, 0xAA, 0xA0);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE7, 0xFE, 0x04, 0xFE, 0x04, 0xFE, 0x04, 0x03, 0x03, 0x03,
> + 0x26, 0x00, 0x26, 0x81, 0x02, 0x40, 0x00, 0x20, 0x9E, 0x04, 0x03,
> + 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBD, 0x03);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0xC6);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xB4, 0x03, 0xFF, 0xF8);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0x3F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xD8, 0x00, 0x2A, 0xAA, 0xA8, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x2A, 0xAA,
> + 0xA8, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x3F, 0xFF, 0xFC, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x3F,
> + 0xFF, 0xFC, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x2A, 0xAA, 0xA8, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
> + 0x2A, 0xAA, 0xA8, 0x00, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBD, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0xC4);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBA, 0x96);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0x3F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBD, 0x01);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0xC5);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBA, 0x4F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xE9, 0x3F);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xBD, 0x00);
> +
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
nit: why two blank lines above?
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + msleep(120);
> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(dsi);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + msleep(80);
Where did the "msleep(80)" come from? I don't see this in the code
you're replacing. If the "msleep(80)" is needed, please introduce it
in a separate patch.
> +
> + return 0;
> +};
> +
> +
> +static int starry_ili9882t_init(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
nit: don't need two blank lines between functions
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + msleep(5);
I know it was doing a msleep(5) before, but I guess it's now more
obvious that (according to the docs) this should be a usleep_range()
or a delay, since delays < 20 ms are documented as not being super
appropriate for msleep(). I guess it doesn't _really_ matter,
though...
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists