[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230706110007.dc4tpyt5e6wxi5pt@quack3>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 13:00:07 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>,
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 39/92] erofs: convert to ctime accessor functions
On Wed 05-07-23 15:01:04, Jeff Layton wrote:
> In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is
> used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
> inode->i_ctime.
>
> Acked-by: Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Just one nit below:
> @@ -176,10 +175,10 @@ static void *erofs_read_inode(struct erofs_buf *buf,
> vi->chunkbits = sb->s_blocksize_bits +
> (vi->chunkformat & EROFS_CHUNK_FORMAT_BLKBITS_MASK);
> }
> - inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = inode->i_ctime.tv_sec;
> - inode->i_atime.tv_sec = inode->i_ctime.tv_sec;
> - inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec;
> - inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec;
> + inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_sec;
> + inode->i_atime.tv_sec = inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_sec;
> + inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_nsec;
> + inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_nsec;
Isn't this just longer way to write:
inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode_get_ctime(inode);
?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists