[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878103c6-0dc3-164b-92ce-17ec4f87bff6@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 14:09:09 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com, quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com,
quic_ramkri@...cinc.com, quic_nayiluri@...cinc.com,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] arm64: qcom: sa8775p: add support for PCIe
On 06/07/2023 13:12, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> Please note that the dts patches should come before driver patches.
>>>
>>
>> Why? DTS is always independent thus usually put at the end of patchset
>> or better separate. It is the first time I hear that DTS should be
>> before driver.
>>
>
> This is what I was suggested by Rob during my initial days and I've been
> following this pattern since then. If that's not the case, I have no issues.
I really doubt Rob ever suggested that. He probably suggested that
bindings must come before user, but not the DTS.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists