[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230706132337.15924-1-cgzones@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 15:23:16 +0200
From: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@...glemail.com>
To: selinux@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/20] selinux: check for multiplication overflow in put_entry()
The function is always inlined and most of the time both relevant
arguments are compile time constants, allowing compilers to elide the
check. Also the function is part of outputting the policy, which is not
performance critical.
Also convert the type of the third parameter into a size_t, since it
should always be a non-negative number of elements.
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@...glemail.com>
---
security/selinux/ss/policydb.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h
index 74b63ed1173f..6b4ad8e91265 100644
--- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h
+++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h
@@ -366,9 +366,12 @@ static inline int next_entry(void *buf, struct policy_file *fp, size_t bytes)
return 0;
}
-static inline int put_entry(const void *buf, size_t bytes, int num, struct policy_file *fp)
+static inline int put_entry(const void *buf, size_t bytes, size_t num, struct policy_file *fp)
{
- size_t len = bytes * num;
+ size_t len;
+
+ if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(bytes, num, &len)))
+ return -EINVAL;
if (len > fp->len)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists