lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2023 14:12:12 +0000
From:   "Hawkins, Nick" <nick.hawkins@....com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        "Verdun, Jean-Marie" <verdun@....com>,
        "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: Add HPE GXP GPIO

Greetings Krzysztof,

Thank you for the feedback. I see that due to a patch conflict I
reintroduced some of the alignment issues you had me fix in
a previous version. This was a mistake and I will correct this.

> > v5:
> > *Removed use of gpio-gxp in favor of just supporting
> > hpe,gxp-gpio-pl for now as the full gpio-gxp will
> > require a much larger patchset

> Bindings describe hardware, not drivers, and should be rather complete.

This patch is intended to still cover the hardware interface between our
BMC and our CPLD which gathers GPIO for us. The part of the binding I
removed was a completely separate interface with different mechanisms
for reading GPIOs. With that said I could keep these two interfaces
separate in yaml files: Having a yaml for hpe,gxp-gpio and another for
hpe,gxp-gpio-pl. Would this be a better approach?

Thank you,

-Nick Hawkins

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ