linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: Add HPE GXP GPIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <31F41D4F-D386-48B5-B941-D5B7C691280A@hpe.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2023 14:12:12 +0000
From:   "Hawkins, Nick" <nick.hawkins@....com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        "Verdun, Jean-Marie" <verdun@....com>,
        "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: Add HPE GXP GPIO

Greetings Krzysztof,

Thank you for the feedback. I see that due to a patch conflict I
reintroduced some of the alignment issues you had me fix in
a previous version. This was a mistake and I will correct this.

> > v5:
> > *Removed use of gpio-gxp in favor of just supporting
> > hpe,gxp-gpio-pl for now as the full gpio-gxp will
> > require a much larger patchset

> Bindings describe hardware, not drivers, and should be rather complete.

This patch is intended to still cover the hardware interface between our
BMC and our CPLD which gathers GPIO for us. The part of the binding I
removed was a completely separate interface with different mechanisms
for reading GPIOs. With that said I could keep these two interfaces
separate in yaml files: Having a yaml for hpe,gxp-gpio and another for
hpe,gxp-gpio-pl. Would this be a better approach?

Thank you,

-Nick Hawkins