linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't pass FOLL_GET to __kvm_follow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230706155805.GD3894444@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2023 08:58:05 -0700
From:   Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
To:     David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't pass FOLL_GET to
 __kvm_follow_pfn

On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 01:52:08PM +0900,
David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 7:17 PM Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 04:50:50PM +0900, David Stevens wrote:
> > > From: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > Stop passing FOLL_GET to __kvm_follow_pfn. This allows the host to map
> > > memory into the guest that is backed by un-refcounted struct pages - for
> > > example, higher order non-compound pages allocated by the amdgpu driver
> > > via ttm_pool_alloc_page.
> >
> > I guess you mean the tail pages of the higher order non-compound pages?
> > And as to the head page, it is said to be set to one coincidentally[*],
> > and shall not be considered as refcounted.  IIUC, refcount of this head
> > page will be increased and decreased soon in hva_to_pfn_remapped(), so
> > this may not be a problem(?). But treating this head page differently,
> > as a refcounted one(e.g., to set the A/D flags), is weired.
> >
> > Or maybe I missed some context, e.g., can the head page be allocted to
> > guest at all?
> 
> Yes, this is to allow mapping the tail pages of higher order
> non-compound pages - I should have been more precise in my wording.
> The head pages can already be mapped into the guest.
> 
> Treating the head and tail pages would require changing how KVM
> behaves in a situation it supports today (rather than just adding
> support for an unsupported situation). Currently, without this series,
> KVM can map VM_PFNMAP|VM_IO memory backed by refcounted pages into the
> guest. When that happens, KVM sets the A/D flags. I'm not sure whether
> that's actually valid behavior, nor do I know whether anyone actually
> cares about it. But it's what KVM does today, and I would shy away
> from modifying that behavior without good reason.
> 
> > >
> > > The bulk of this change is tracking the is_refcounted_page flag so that
> > > non-refcounted pages don't trigger page_count() == 0 warnings. This is
> > > done by storing the flag in an unused bit in the sptes.
> >
> > Also, maybe we should mention this only works on x86-64.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h |  1 +
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h  |  9 ++++---
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c         |  4 ++-
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h         | 12 ++++++++-
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c      | 22 ++++++++++-------
> > >  6 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > > index e44ab512c3a1..b1607e314497 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > @@ -2937,6 +2943,7 @@ static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > >       bool host_writable = !fault || fault->map_writable;
> > >       bool prefetch = !fault || fault->prefetch;
> > >       bool write_fault = fault && fault->write;
> > > +     bool is_refcounted = !fault || fault->is_refcounted_page;
> >
> > Just wonder, what if a non-refcounted page is prefetched?  Or is it possible in
> > practice?
> 
> Prefetching is still done via gfn_to_page_many_atomic, which sets
> FOLL_GET. That's fixable, but it's not something this series currently
> does.

So if we prefetch a page, REFCOUNTED bit is cleared unconditionally with this
hunk.  kvm_set_page_{dirty, accessed} won't be called as expected for prefetched
spte.  If I read the patch correctly, REFCOUNTED bit in SPTE should represent
whether the corresponding page is ref-countable or not, right?

Because direct_pte_prefetch_many() is for legacy KVM MMU and FNAME(prefetch_pte)
is shadow paging, we need to test it with legacy KVM MMU or shadow paging to hit
the issue, though.

Thanks,
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>