[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZKdiIGRAQYx9zILj@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:53:52 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, guoren@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
bjorn@...osinc.com, alex@...ti.fr, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
atishp@...osinc.com, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v7 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G
explicitly on riscv
On 07/04/23 at 09:23pm, Chen Jiahao wrote:
> On riscv, the current crash kernel allocation logic is trying to
> allocate within 32bit addressible memory region by default, if
> failed, try to allocate without 4G restriction.
>
> In need of saving DMA zone memory while allocating a relatively large
> crash kernel region, allocating the reserved memory top down in
> high memory, without overlapping the DMA zone, is a mature solution.
> Hence this patchset introduces the parameter option crashkernel=X,[high,low].
>
> One can reserve the crash kernel from high memory above DMA zone range
> by explicitly passing "crashkernel=X,high"; or reserve a memory range
> below 4G with "crashkernel=X,low". Besides, there are few rules need
> to take notice:
> 1. "crashkernel=X,[high,low]" will be ignored if "crashkernel=size"
> is specified.
> 2. "crashkernel=X,low" is valid only when "crashkernel=X,high" is passed
> and there is enough memory to be allocated under 4G.
> 3. When allocating crashkernel above 4G and no "crashkernel=X,low" is
> specified, a 128M low memory will be allocated automatically for
> swiotlb bounce buffer.
> See Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt for more information.
>
> To verify loading the crashkernel, adapted kexec-tools is attached below:
> https://github.com/chenjh005/kexec-tools/tree/build-test-riscv-v2
>
> Following test cases have been performed as expected:
> 1) crashkernel=256M //low=256M
> 2) crashkernel=1G //low=1G
> 3) crashkernel=4G //high=4G, low=128M(default)
> 4) crashkernel=4G crashkernel=256M,high //high=4G, low=128M(default), high is ignored
> 5) crashkernel=4G crashkernel=256M,low //high=4G, low=128M(default), low is ignored
> 6) crashkernel=4G,high //high=4G, low=128M(default)
> 7) crashkernel=256M,low //low=0M, invalid
> 8) crashkernel=4G,high crashkernel=256M,low //high=4G, low=256M
> 9) crashkernel=4G,high crashkernel=4G,low //high=0M, low=0M, invalid
> 10) crashkernel=512M@...0000000 //low=512M
> 11) crashkernel=1G,high crashkernel=0M,low //high=1G, low=0M
The series looks good to me, thanks.
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists